BC Liberal Leadership Candidate Claims Electoral Reform Vote is a ‘Threat to Democracy’
Andrew Wilkinson might have a thing or two to learn about democracy
According to one BC Liberal leadership candidate, British Columbia’s upcoming vote on electoral reform is an attack on democracy.
Andrew Wilkinson, BC’s former Minister of Advanced Education, is sharing alarmist images on Twitter claiming the province’s planned 2018 vote on electoral reform has already been “rigged,” declaring it an “immediate threat” to “democracy.”
BC’s upcoming electoral reform referendum will give voters the opportunity to stick with the province’s outdated First-Past-the-Post system (FPTP) or move to an as-of-yet undetermined proportional representation system.
Yet even though most developed countries already use some form of proportional voting, Wilkinson tweeted this weekend that putting this question to a vote will “undermine our democracy.”
Wilkinson also suggests “changing British Columbia’s 150 year-old electoral system” is designed to help the NDP “cling to power.”
“We have an immediate threat. The NDP wants to undermine our democracy with their rigged referendum on proportional representation. I’m taking action on this today.” #BCLib18 pic.twitter.com/Uz2dnrANx6
— Andrew Wilkinson (@Wilkinson4BC) November 19, 2017
A vote on moving to proportional representation will “undermine our democracy”?
Currently, over 80% of OECD countries already have a proportional voting system in place – meaning Canada and British Columbia are actually outliers.
In fact, one reason many countries moved to proportional representation is exactly because it produces more democratic results than Canada’s outdated first-past-the-post system which regularly produces strange and distorted results.
That’s because FPTP is designed as winner-take-all system. As a result, many British Columbians are stranded in ridings where they’re represented by someone a majority of people didn’t vote for – effectively, those are called wasted votes.
And as National Post columnist Andrew Coyne puts it, the current FPTP system is not very democratic itself:
“If ballots were issued to some voters but not others, or in packs of two or nine or twenty-nine, depending on which party you voted for and what riding you lived in, there’d be riots in the streets … In some provincial elections, the same phenomenon results in one party winning all seats in the house, or nearly so. What kind of democracy is one party and no opposition?”
Proportional representation, on the other hand, aims to award the same percentage of seats as the total percentage of votes, so you end up with a more equal and democratic outcome.
In only the past few weeks, BC has already seen:
- The sudden appearance of an anti-electoral reform astroturf group run by Kellie Leitch’s former campaign manager;
- BC Liberal leadership candidate Dianne Watts launch into bizarre Twitter rant predicting the BC Liberals will “forever be a minority” if her party loses the electoral reform vote;
- BC Liberal leadership candidate Michael Lee claim electoral reform would lead to a shortage of politicians in the province.
Our journalism is powered by readers like you.
We’re an award-winning non-profit news organization that covers topics like social and economic inequality, big business and labour, and right-wing extremism.
Help us build so we can bring to light stories that don’t get the attention they deserve from Canada’s big corporate media outlets.