fraserinstitute-grinch-thumb-1.png
fraserinstitute-grinch-thumb-1.png This article is more than 8 years old

Fraser Institute tries and fails to be the Grinch Who Stole Labour Day

Maybe the Fraser Institute’s heart is two sizes too small? On the eve of Labour Day, the right-wing think tank just published its annual “study” that tries to make a case for rolling back worker rights. We haven’t heard the Fraser Institute talk much of so-called “right-to-work” since former Ontario PC leader Tim Hudak dropped the idea earlier […]

Maybe the Fraser Institute’s heart is two sizes too small?

On the eve of Labour Day, the right-wing think tank just published its annual “study” that tries to make a case for rolling back worker rights.

We haven’t heard the Fraser Institute talk much of so-called “right-to-work” since former Ontario PC leader Tim Hudak dropped the idea earlier this year, which is funny because Hudak’s idea actually came from the Fraser Institute.

(Right-to-work legislation allows workers in unionized workplaces to opt out of union membership and paying dues. In Canada, that effectively means getting rid of the Rand formula, established in the 1946 Supreme Court decision to ensure there are no free riders; while workers can choose whether to join a union, they must pay dues to the union if they are covered by the collective agreement negotiated with the employer.)

In a world where up is down and down is up, the Fraser Institute’s “study” classifies “right-to-work” jurisdictions as balanced and unbiased (Mississippi, Arkansas, Utah, Alabama, and Texas, to name a few). These U.S. states offer “flexibility” while other jurisdictions with labour laws to protect workers (Canadian provinces) are “biased.” 

Here’s a map the think tank put out to hammer home the point:

fraserinstitute-bias.png

And what exactly does “flexibility” mean? “Flexibility means employees can more easily change jobs, or even industries, in search of better compensation or working conditions,” the report says. “Similarly, flexibility allows employers to change the mix of capital and labour to respond to market changes.”

So, what? “Flexibility” means easier to drive down benefits and wages and lay people off or fire them when it’s convenient?

To make its case, the Fraser Institute’s number wizards put together a score card ranking provinces according to a list of indicators (including how easy it is to unionize, how hard it is to decertify a union and the presence of laws and regulations relating to unions).

They call it the “Index of Labour Relations Laws” to give it the aura of not being a silly exercise in engineering the answers Fraser Institute wants.

(For methodological problems with other Institute “indexes,” see what this UN agency has to say about the Institute’s “Economic Freedom of the World Index”.)

Take a look at the chart down below. Note how everyone gets a big fat zero except the U.S. states with “right-to-work” laws, even though these “regulations” are enshrined in a watershed Supreme Court of Canada decision:

2fraser-scores.png

 Seriously, this index looks just as silly as this:

3fraser4kidz_0.png

And here’s some facts about “right-to-work” that conveniently failed to make it into Fraser Institute’s report:

  • Workers in American “right-to-work” states earn an average of $1,540 less per year and median household income is $6,437 less than non “right-to-work” states.

  • an estimated 3.8 million Americans would lose their pensions if all states adopted “right-to-work” legislation.
  • Workplace deaths are 36% higher in “right-to-work” states.
The last word, though, goes to the CBC’s The Exchange with Amanda Lang:
 

 

 

Photo: melissaclark. Used under a Creative Commons BY-2.0 licence.

Our journalism is powered by readers like you.

We’re an award-winning non-profit news organization that covers topics like social and economic inequality, big business and labour, and right-wing extremism.

Help us build so we can bring to light stories that don’t get the attention they deserve from Canada’s big corporate media outlets.

 

Donate
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

A4C News

Pierre Poilievre Claims He’s a Friend of the ‘Working Class’. He’s Spent Years Attacking Canadian Workers.

Related Stories

News

Christian Nationalists Are Organizing Against LGBTQ Curriculum in Schools

View the post
News

5,000 Winnipeg City Workers Poised to Strike for the First Time in a Century

View the post
News

TELUS Wanted Workers to Stay Quiet About Off-Shoring Practice to Protect Its Image, Documents Show

View the post

Explainers

Human rights & inclusion

Amira Elghawaby

Here’s The Problem With Hoping Corporations Will Be Socially and Environmentally Responsible On Their Own

View the post
Politics & strategy

Jeremy Appel

The battle of the PACs in Calgary’s municipal election

View the post
Politics & strategy

Jeremy Appel

27 Different Candidates are Vying to be Calgary’s Mayor. Here Are the Biggest Issues at Stake.

View the post
Newspapers always have a business section – why not a labour section? We’ve launched a free newsletter covering labour issues in Canada.
Get Canadian Labour News You Won't Find in Corporate Newspapers.
We’ve launched a free newsletter covering labour issues in Canada.
Get Canadian Labour News You Won't Find in Corporate Newspapers