2019-08-15_thumb
2019-08-15_thumb
Exclusive

Alberta School Bus Company Says It Used a Secret Scorecard to Track Drivers Who Support Unions

School bus company said it thwarted a union drive by secretly ranking drivers on a scale of one to four for pro-union sentiment

August 27, 2019

A company that drives 50,000 children to school in Alberta every morning used a secret scorecard system to identify school bus drivers loyal to management and single-out workers who may hold pro-union sentiments.

Representatives from Southland Transportation Ltd, a subsidiary of Pacific Western, shared details about its Orwellian union-busting tactic with HR professionals and corporate executives gathered at the Toronto Airport Hilton for a conference run by the anti-union group LabourWatch earlier this summer.

Attendees of LabourWatch 2019 included representatives from household names like McDonalds, Sobeys Inc., Sleep Country Canada and the Hudson’s Bay Company.

Fast food giant A&W Canada faced calls for a boycott after PressProgress recently reported how company executives revealed they keep a secret “watch list” to closely monitor franchises it believes could be at risk of unionizing.

Brandi Tracksell, Pacific Western’s Labour Relations director, told the anti-union conference that Southland went an extra step further than A&W.

In a presentation titled “Another Teamster Drive, They Never Stop!” Tracksell, along with Southland managers Craig Loose and Pamela Matijon, pointed to their secret scorecards as an example of a “successful employer response to union organizing.”

An audio recording of their June 25 talk was reviewed exclusively by PressProgress. Southland did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Southland Transportation Ltd. Power Point slide from LabourWatch conference

According to Southlands presentation, the company ranked school bus drivers on a scale of one to four to sort school bus drivers with pro-union sentiments from school bus drivers loyal to management.

After learning the Teamsters were organizing a union drive in its school bus division, Tracksell said she asked management to assign a number to each driver.

“I needed to know number one: Who are the company supporters? Who are our friends? Who can we go and talk to?” Tracksell told the anti-union conference.

“And, number fours,” she continued, “Who are people that you believe, based on your interactions daily with these employees, are likely union supporters?”

“I don’t want to go over there and talk to them right away,” she explained. “So, I asked the manager to put that list together.”

She added: “I didn’t do the twos and threes because those weren’t important to me.”

Southland Transportation Ltd. presentation at LabourWatch conference

The Pacific Western representative elaborated that this data was used to help stop the union drive in Southlands school bus division.

“And so from that list that Jenny (the manager) had ranked as company supporters, we sat down with our leadership team and of those people flagged as company supporters — and we went and visited those employees,” Tracksell said. 

“They helped us understand what was going on in terms of this union drive” and “gave us some information,” she said. “‘Yeah, I did hear about this union thing, there was this meeting’, and they’d tell us everything — we didn’t specifically ask about it — we just said: ‘Do you have some concerns? What’s going on?’ They gave it all to us.”

This information was used to develop anti-union messages for the other workers: “We hear you, we admit we can do better — but your issues will not be fixed in a collective agreement.”

Pamela Matijon, Southland’s organizational development facilitator, compared her company’s anti-union strategy to calming a “barking dog.”

“We need to find out why that dog is barking,” the senior manager said. “You need to find out what’s going on. So that’s what we did. We walked towards the barking dog.”

Other slides during the presentation show the company collected intel on workers by monitoring a special Facebook group for school bus drivers.

Southland Transportation Ltd. Power Point slide from LabourWatch conference

John Mortimer, President of LabourWatch and the lead organizer of the anti-union conference, advocated the use of scorecards” to keep track of whether individual workers are “pro-union” or “pro-company.”

You work with your management and say ‘where does this person stand on the union?’” Mortimer explained. “You add it up and say ‘how are we doing? Who are the fence-sitters? Who’s pro-union? Who is pro-company?’

In another talk, Fasken LLP lawyer Mathias Link presented a scorecard his law firm prepared for an unnamed food manufacturer that makes soups and specialty foods for grocery stores with two plants in the Greater Toronto Area and 538 employees — largely from temp agencies.

Fasken LLP did not respond to a request for comment from PressProgress.

Fasken LLP Power Point slide from LabourWatch conference

Mortimer admitted there is a bit of a perception that (scorecards) are unlawful, but assured the conference he had this researched in Alberta, British Columbia, Quebec and Ontario. He said he could not find a single decision that even talked about this employer practice.

Id bet theres tens of thousands of these lists that have been done by employers over the decades through union drives and decertifications, Mortimer suggested. Some employers are doing them every week.

Mike Sherrard, an employer-side lawyer with Sherrard Kuzz LLP, agreed the practice is widespread: I bet it happens 90% of the time.”

Theres no case law because unions arent challenging it, Mortimer added. Theyre not even trying to get these employer lists, they know weve got them.

Power Point slide from LabourWatch conference

Mortimer told the conference the only downside would be if a scorecard was made public, conceding it might be embarrassing and damaging to their credibility.

In fact, he recalled that “Sobeys told me a story once” about a case in Quebec where the company was confronted with a leaked copy of one of its scorecards, after telling a Labour Board it did not conduct the practice.

Mortimer said, according to the story, “they were in a hearing in Quebec and they were asked if they had done one of these lists and the head of Human Resources at the time said no. And then boom comes the Sobeys list of all the names and all the ratings.”

Sobeys, whose operations in Quebec are nearly 100% unionized, firmly denied the Canadian LabourWatch Association President’s claims.

John Mortimer misspoke, a Sobeys spokesperson told PressProgress after an audio clip of the LabourWatch President was shared with the grocery chain.

This is not a practice Sobeys held during the hearing Mr. Mortimer is referencing and not a practice we follow now.

Sobeys is a member of the Retail Council of Canada, which is one of LabourWatch’s core member associations.

 

Invest in our work

We break news and shine a light on stories Canada’s major media outlets miss. But we need your help to keep making an impact.

Subscribe to our Friday Newsletter

Too busy to follow the daily news? Get the inside scoop on the entire week’s news sent to your email inbox every Friday at noon.

Invest in our work

We break news and shine a light on stories Canada’s major media outlets miss. But we need your help to keep making an impact.

2019-08-14_thumb
2019-08-14_thumb
Analysis

In 2016, Brian Pallister Said Poverty Is His ‘Number One Issue’. In 2019, He Didn’t Show Up to a Debate on Poverty.

Here’s a quick rundown of the Pallister government’s cuts to programs that fight poverty

August 26, 2019

Manitoba PC leader Brian Pallister failed to show up to a leaders’ debate on poverty last week organized by anti-poverty groups.

That’s quite the turn of events from 2016 when Pallister declared during a leaders’ debate that “poverty” is “the number one issue for us in this province.”

“We’d given them every opportunity to send a…