vanloan-gibberish-thumb-1.png
vanloan-gibberish-thumb-1.png This article is more than 6 years old

Watch Conservatives mount courageous defence of their right to talk gibberish

Peter Van Loan is a freedom fighter. The Conservative government’s House Leader on Monday offered a spirited defence of the right to dodge legitimate questions with off-topic answers during debate of an NDP motion to empower the Speaker to clamp down on irrelevant answers during Question Period. “This change would affect responses to oral questions, […]

Peter Van Loan is a freedom fighter.

The Conservative government’s House Leader on Monday offered a spirited defence of the right to dodge legitimate questions with off-topic answers during debate of an NDP motion to empower the Speaker to clamp down on irrelevant answers during Question Period.

“This change would affect responses to oral questions, but it would not touch the actual questions,” Van Loan complained.

What he didn’t say is questions are already covered by rules intended to keep them relevant and on point.

“Of course, that the NDP didn’t include questions in its proposal might be because questions are already subject to a standard of relevancy — a standard that does not currently apply to responses,” Maclean Magazine’s Aaron Wherry explains, pointing to this explanation offered up by Speaker Andrew Scheer on January 28, 2014:

“I will continue to rule questions out of order that do not establish a direct link to the administrative responsibilities of the government. In the same sense, so-called hybrid questions will also continue to risk being ruled out of order when this link is not quickly demonstrated. Members should take care when formulating their questions and establish this link as soon as possible in posing their questions to ensure that the Chair does not rule what may be a legitimate question out of order.”

But Van Loan’s bigger problem seems to be that he thinks it’s the government’s duty to hold the opposition to account during Question Period.

“The Leader of the Opposition would prefer to make question period a one-way street,” Van Loan protested. “He wants the rules changed to keep him from facing any tough questions or cold facts.”

Because that’s exactly the point of Question Period — 45 minutes set aside each day for the government to grill the opposition parties?

Unfortunately for Van Loan, the Speaker also said this in his January ruling:

“The speaker must adhere to the longstanding principle that question period is intended to hold the government to account.”

Watch Van Loan’s courageous defence of his right to be irrelevant:

 

 

 

Photo: YouTube

Help us protect Canadians by holding the powerful accountable.

Journalism is an important public service. That’s why PressProgress is prioritizing stories aimed at keeping Canadians safe and holding the powerful accountable during the coronavirus pandemic.

Please consider supporting our award-winning non-profit news organization so we can keep making a positive impact for Canadians.

 

Support Our Journalism
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2021-02-024 Analysis

Doug Ford, In the Middle of a Deadly Pandemic, Calls Paid Sick Days a ‘Waste of Taxpayers Money’

Related Stories

Analysis

Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister’s ‘Mystery Bills’ Are a ‘Dangerous’ Violation of Democratic Standards, Experts Say

View the post
Fact-Check

Canada Proud is Spreading Misleading Propaganda Claiming COVID-19 Vaccines Will Be Distributed According to ‘Skin Colour’

View the post
News

Jason Kenney Quietly Cut His Energy War Room’s Funding By Two-Thirds Using a Sneaky Accounting Trick

View the post

Explainers

Politics & strategy

Tom Parkin

Why Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh Are Taking Very Different Positions on Private, For-Profit Long-Term Care

View the post
Human rights & inclusion

Amira Elghawaby

Why The Full Impact of Hate Groups on Targeted Communities Is Not Captured By Hate Crime Statistics

View the post
Power and democracy

Andrea Reimer

How The COVID-19 Pandemic Revealed Canada’s Most Powerful People Have Less Power Than They Think

View the post