ablonczy-whatever-thumb-1.png
ablonczy-whatever-thumb-1.png

VIDEO: Conservative MP uses “air quotes” to dismiss C-51 concerns from legal experts

“Rule of law?” Whatever! During the final day of parliamentary hearings into the government’s controversial anti-terrorism bill, Conservative MP Diane Ablonczy used air quotes to dismiss an amendment, first proposed by the Canadian Bar Association, that would have put into writing that Canadian judges can’t authorize violations of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: “Now […]

April 1, 2015

“Rule of law?” Whatever!

During the final day of parliamentary hearings into the government’s controversial anti-terrorism bill, Conservative MP Diane Ablonczy used air quotes to dismiss an amendment, first proposed by the Canadian Bar Association, that would have put into writing that Canadian judges can’t authorize violations of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms:

“Now the judge has to also consider … something like ‘rule of law’, they have to consider things like ‘principles of fundamental justice,’ whatever that is … There would be such a morass of opinions and considerations that action would be pretty much at a stalemate.”

Got that? Forcing judges to follow this so-called “rule of law” thing will just confuse judges and waste everyone’s time, so “whatever.”

During the clause-by-clause review of C-51, Ablonczy (who had previously accused a civil liberties group representing Canadian Muslims of supporting terrorism — that group is currently in the process of suing the Prime Minister’s Office for defamation) also accused the Green Party (which tabled the amendment at committee) of putting Canada’s national security interests at risk by putting “barriers in the way of protecting Canadian society against terrorism and terror threats.”

You know. “Barriers.” Like the Constitution.

The amendment was based on a recommendation brought forward by the Canadian Bar Association, a national association representing 36,000 lawyers across Canada.

Specifically, the CBA believes “judges should not authorize Charter violations,” as C-51 appears “to provide for judicial warrants to authorize the violation of any Charter rights. This brings the entire Charter into risk, and is unprecedented.”

“It is untenable that the infringement of Charter rights is open to debate, in secret proceedings where only the government is represented.”

And here’s what they proposed to make C-51 better:

cba-ruleoflaw.png

Journalists monitoring the proceedings were quick to react to Ablonczy’s remarks:

Meanwhile, some legal experts were perplexed by Ablonczy’s skepticism of terms used in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms:

SORRY, WE'RE NOT SHUTTING UP

Dear readers: Rebel Media is sending their lawyer after us. But we're not shutting up. Contribute to our journalism defence fund today so we can defend ourselves in court.

calgary-thumb-1.png
calgary-thumb-1.png

Close to half of Albertans now say they want to raise corporate taxes

It could be time for Corporate Alberta to shoulder some responsibility and pony up. A new poll looking at Alberta’s shifting political landscape found that two-thirds of Albertans favour some form of tax increase — over more cuts and layoffs — to manage the province’s budget deficit, according to the Calgary Herald. And 44% of […]

March 31, 2015

It could be time for Corporate Alberta to shoulder some responsibility and pony up.

A new poll looking at Alberta’s shifting political landscape found that two-thirds of Albertans favour some form of tax increase — over more cuts and layoffs — to manage the province’s budget deficit, according to the Calgary Herald.

And 44% of those polled said they specifically favour raising corporate taxes (with a marginal rate of 10%, Alberta’s corporate tax rate is currently the…