6218205413_cc88f6bf5a_o-1.jpg
6218205413_cc88f6bf5a_o-1.jpg This article is more than 6 years old

Here are all the times the Conservatives changed election rules without a referendum

People who live in glass houses...

unnamed.gif

People who live in glass houses…

The Conservatives continue to insist that any change to Canada’s electoral system requires a referendum. 

“When you change the rules of democracy, everyone gets to have a say”, says interim leader Rona Ambrose. “If the Liberals want to make a fundamental change to our country’s voting system, the process must not be dominated by one political party’s interests.”

Let’s review all the times the Conservatives changed the rules of Canadian democracy without a referendum, shall we? 

Fixing election dates

In May 2007, the Conservatives passed Bill C-16 which fixed future Canadian elections to the third Monday of October every four years. (Barely a year later, the Conservatives broke the spirit of their own law by calling an election for October 14, 2008). 

Eliminating the per vote subsidy 

After winning a majority in 2011, the Conservatives introduced the “Keeping Canada’s Economy and Jobs Growing Act”, slipping in changes to the Elections Act that eliminated Canada’s per-vote subsidy which awarded parties $2 for every vote they received.

Critics were quick to point out that opposition parties stood to lose the most from the change.

Adding seats to the House of Commons 

Bill C-20, passed in December 2011, legislated a new formula for determining the number of MPs each province would get and the House of Commons grew from 308 to 338 seats.

At the time, critics worried that the new seats would mostly appear in Conservative strongholds. 

The Unfair Elections Act 

When it comes to changing Canadian democracy without consulting people, this one takes the cake.

The Orwellian “Fair Elections Act” represented a significant overhaul of the way Canadian elections would be run. Its changes were extensive, but here are a few, um, highlights:

  • Elections Canada was forbidden to run adds encouraging people to vote or distribute kits to schoolchildren designed to educate them about democracy and voting

  • The annual amount candidates and leadership contestants were permitted to donate to themselves was increased from $1,000 to $5,000 and $25,000 respectively

  • The personal annual contribution limit to candidates and parties was increased from $1,000 to $1,500 

  • The spending limit for parties in elections was increased

  • Voter registration cards would no longer be considered appropriate ID at polling stations and vouching would be eliminated

Critics pointed out that the changes to ID rules in particular would make it more difficult for First Nations, youth, and people living in poverty to vote.

The Conservatives not only failed to consult Elections Canada but rammed the bill through Parliament without serious debate.

How quickly some things are forgotten…

Photo: Sharon Drummond. Licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 2.0 license. 

 

Our journalism is powered by readers like you.

We’re an award-winning non-profit news organization that covers topics like social and economic inequality, big business and labour, and right-wing extremism.

Help us build so we can bring to light stories that don’t get the attention they deserve from Canada’s big corporate media outlets.

 

Donate
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2022-06-015 Analysis

Top Doug Ford Adviser Sent Premier’s Office Backchannel Message About Meeting With Russian Government

Related Stories

Analysis

Pierre Poilievre is Under Fire After Leading a Far-Right March Through Ottawa Residential Neighbourhood

View the post
New

Infrastructure Bank Wants To Let Private Finance ‘Renew’ the ‘Water Sector’

View the post
News

WestJet asked non-union staff to provide scab labour in case of Calgary, Vancouver strike

View the post

Explainers

Human rights & inclusion

Amira Elghawaby

Here’s The Problem With Hoping Corporations Will Be Socially and Environmentally Responsible On Their Own

View the post
Politics & strategy

Jeremy Appel

The battle of the PACs in Calgary’s municipal election

View the post
Politics & strategy

Jeremy Appel

27 Different Candidates are Vying to be Calgary’s Mayor. Here Are the Biggest Issues at Stake.

View the post
Why do newspapers always have a business section but not a labour section? We’ve launched a free newsletter covering labour issues in Canada.
Get All Your Canadian Labour News in One Place
Why do newspapers always have a business section but not a labour section? Good news! We’ve launched a newsletter covering labour issues in Canada.