Professional Educators Don’t Take the Fraser Institute’s School Rankings Seriously. Neither Should You.
Experts have debunked the Fraser Institute’s school rankings so many times, it’s easy to lose count
Good news kids, the Fraser Institute is back with its annual ranking of elementary schools in British Columbia.
But it looks like several local news outlets around the province forgot to inform their readers that experts have repeatedly pointed to serious problems with the right-wing think tank’s discredited ranking system.
After all, some readers might be interested to learn that many education experts have described the right-wing think tank’s rankings as “not objective” and even as “discriminatory” against disadvantaged students.
Here’s a quick reminder of five reasons educators don’t take the right-wing think tank’s rankings seriously:
1. The methodology is deeply flawed
The institute’s data relies solely on standardized test scores, and in a narrow range of subjects: reading, writing and numeracy. University of Victoria professor Jason Price said: “they’re not objective at all.”
“These tests give us such a narrow picture in terms of what’s being done in schools,” Price told CBC news last year.
2. They’re biased in favour of private schools
In 2016 the Fraser Institute’s Executive Vice President told the Atlas Group his organization’s school ranking system was part of a “communications agenda” designed to “convince people” there’s a “problem” with the public school system.
3. They discriminate against disadvantaged students
Because the Fraser Institute’s rankings focus exclusively on average scores from the provincial Foundational Skills Assessment, which tests literacy and numeracy, many say the rankings discriminate against students from disadvantaged backgrounds who typically struggle on the test.
President of the BC School Trustees Association Gordon Swan said: “many disadvantaged students don’t perform well on the test.”
“Aboriginal students, students with special needs, immigrant students when their primary language isn’t English and students from impoverished backgrounds,” he added.
4. Even private schools think the rankings aren’t credible
Even leaders from private schools that rank top of the Fraser Institute’s report card think the right-wing think tank’s methodology is bogus.
Chantal Gionet, head of York House School, told the Globe and Mail: the institute’s rankings “simply don’t capture” the full range of students’ talents.
Patricia Dawson, head of Crofton House School, said: “we greatly appreciate that the public at large, and certainly a broader parent community, looks at those rankings and puts a lot of stock in them. We do not.”
5. Canada’s top courts don’t take the rankings seriously either
Some parents have tried to gain custody of their children partly on the basis they live close to a school ranked highly by the Fraser Institute’s report card. Courts have dismissed these attempts.
During a 2015 trial in the Ontario Superior Court, a judge said the right-wing think tank’s rankings were “not admissible” as evidence.
“I am not persuaded that a straight ranking system, as tendered by the Fraser Institute, is a reliable indicator of what is in these children’s best interests.”
Our journalism is powered by readers like you.
We’re an award-winning non-profit news organization that covers topics like social and economic inequality, big business and labour, and right-wing extremism.
Help us build so we can bring to light stories that don’t get the attention they deserve from Canada’s big corporate media outlets.