trudeau-gazing_thumb-1.png
trudeau-gazing_thumb-1.png This article is more than 7 years old

Justin Trudeau says Canadians want Justin Trudeau, not electoral reform

Trudeau confessed he's a victim of his own success.

pressprogress-bannerad-watchourvideo.gif

 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is signaling he may break a major promise to reform Canada’s electoral system because he believes Canadians “like” him better than his predecessor – Stephen Harper, who he says made Canadians “unhappy.”

In an interview published by Le Devoir Wednesday, Trudeau confessed to being a victim of his own success and mused that Canadians are less “motivated” for electoral reform after the last election because Canadians “no longer have a government we don’t like”:

“Under Stephen Harper, there were so many people unhappy with the government and their approach that people were saying, ‘It will take electoral reform to no longer have a government we don’t like’. But under the current system, they now have a government they’re more satisfied with and the motivation to change the electoral system is less compelling.”

Trudeau also hinted that when all is said and done, Canadians may only end up seeing “a little change” instead of “a big change”: 

“Less support and a small change might be acceptable. Bigger changes would require more support. What’s a big change? What’s a little change? These questions are why there must be rigorous, intelligent discussions with Canadians.”

Only problem?

During the 2015 federal election, Trudeau promised big changes.

 

In fact, even after the election, Trudeau repeatedly insisted that “the 2015 election will be the last federal election using first-past-the-post”:

Despite Trudeau’s comments, electoral reform advocates are generally less “motivated” by narrow partisan outcomes than they are with creating a more balanced system that better aligns with democratic values.

Canada’s first-past-the-post system is often criticized as a system that regularly produces distorted outcomes and a relic of the 19th century – nearly every Canadian election since the 1920s has seen a party who received less than 50% of the vote rewarded with 100% of the decision-making power.

And on a riding-by-riding basis, 60.65% of MPs currently sitting in the House of Commons won their seats with the support of less than 50% of their local constituents.

That amounts to a majority of voters left with representation that doesn’t reflect the votes they cast – a key problem electoral reform advocates seek to overcome by distributing seats proportionally rather than on a winner-take-all basis, better reflecting the will of voters

Photo: PMO.

Our journalism is powered by readers like you.

We’re an award-winning non-profit news organization that covers topics like social and economic inequality, big business and labour, and right-wing extremism.

Help us build so we can bring to light stories that don’t get the attention they deserve from Canada’s big corporate media outlets.

 

Donate
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2024-05-07-rainbow-rally-vancouver News

Take Back Alberta Leaders are Training ‘Scrutineers’ to Infiltrate Campaigns and Act as ‘Security’ on Voting Day

Related Stories

News

Hundreds of People Rallied in Vancouver against Anti-LGBTQ+ Hate. Here’s What They Had to Say.

View the post
ANALYSIS

International Students are Coming to Canada Dreaming of a Better Life. Many Are Leaving Disillusioned and In Debt.

View the post
PODCAST

After the assassination of a Sikh on Canadian soil, what did (or didn’t) the foreign interference commission reveal about India?

View the post
Our free email newsletter delivers award-winning journalism directly to your inbox.
Get Canadian Investigative News You Won't Find in Corporate Newspapers.
Our free email newsletter delivers award-winning journalism to your inbox.
Get Canadian Investigative News You Won't Find in Corporate Newspapers.