electoralreform-money_thumb-1.png
electoralreform-money_thumb-1.png This article is more than 4 years old

Fraser Institute: giving voters fewer choices would be good for the economy

The Fraser Institute seems to believe more "choice" is the answer to everything – except when it comes to democracy.

kenneywatch-banner.gif

 

The Fraser Institute seems to believe more “choice” is the answer to everything – except when it comes to democracy.

According to the right-wing think tank’s new report on electoral reform, the economy is better served when “fewer parties” are involved in the democratic process.

This may come as little surprise considering they see no correlation between democracy and happiness and their experts say Hong Kong is “number one in overall freedom” in the world, but it still sounds a little fishy coming from the Fraser Institute considering their own motto suggests “choice” is the cornerstone of “a free and prosperous world”:

fraser-institute-choice.jpg

So what does the Fraser Institute have against giving voters more choices?

Because an electoral system based on proportional representation would lead to “the increased likelihood of electing more parties,” the Fraser Institute explains.

And although they concede “electoral rules do not necessarily affect fiscal policy directly,” they speculate anyway that this could lead to more spending on public services:

“A side effect of the incentives embedded within PR electoral systems is that they are far more likely to require coalitions to govern since it is significantly more difficult for them to secure a majority in an election … the costs of the coalition, which take the form of policies implemented in the government, are born … by the broader public.”

But a majoritarian system – like Canada’s current first-past-the-post system – is much better equipped for forcing through austerity policies, laying off public servants and gutting pensions.

The Fraser Institute highlights data they say shows a single-party, majority government is in a stronger position to take a “tough fiscal stance, particularly when politically sensitive programs, government employment and social security are involved.”

Because isn’t that what democracy is all about? Taking a tough line against your own people?

To help get their point across, the Fraser Institute also has a handy visual of two businessmen (red and blue, symbolizing a two-party system) taking a leisurely drive juxtaposed with several multi-coloured businessmen struggling for control of a car as it swerves erratically across the road: 

fraserinstitute-electoralreform.jpg

Gosh, imagine an electoral system that gave you more choices and resulted in governments spending money on issues people care about instead of one-party majorities most people didn’t even vote for taking “tough” stands against their own people?

That sounds like chaos!

Photo: Makaristos. Used under Creative Commons license.

Help us protect Canadians by holding the powerful accountable.

Journalism is an important public service. That’s why PressProgress is prioritizing stories aimed at keeping Canadians safe and holding the powerful accountable during the coronavirus pandemic.

Please consider supporting our award-winning non-profit news organization so we can keep making a positive impact for Canadians.

 

Support Our Journalism
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2021-06-022 News

Doug Ford’s Government Cut Education By More Than Half a Billion Dollars, New Report Finds

Related Stories

News

Ontario PC MPP Held Shares in Amazon As Government Faced Criticism Over Outbreaks at Amazon Warehouses

View the post
Explainer

Why Canadian Politics Does Such a Bad Job at Reflecting Working Class Values

View the post
News Brief

Zero Per Cent of Manitobans Say They Are ‘Very Satisfied’ With Brian Pallister’s Handling of COVID-19 Pandemic, Poll Finds

View the post

Explainers

Power and democracy

Andrea Reimer

Why Canadian Politics Does Such a Bad Job at Reflecting Working Class Values

View the post
Politics & strategy

Tom Parkin

Why Jason Kenney is Playing Politics with the Horrific Legacy of Canada’s Residential Schools

View the post
Work & rights

Liz Walker and Shanice Regis-Wilkins

Here is What Everyone in Canada Needs To Know About How Collective Bargaining Really Works

View the post