healthcare-thumb-1.png
healthcare-thumb-1.png This article is more than 6 years old

Five ways the government has put medicare on life support

Months away from a federal election, no one’s really talking about the elephant in the emergency room: medicare. The diagnosis isn’t good. iPolitics Linda McQuaig has weighed in, arguing that the Conservative government has quietly eroded our health care system, stacking the deck for failure and increased privatization. She argues that “two-tier medicine is a virtual certainty if the […]

Months away from a federal election, no one’s really talking about the elephant in the emergency room: medicare.

The diagnosis isn’t good.

iPolitics Linda  has weighed in, arguing that the Conservative government has quietly eroded our health care system, stacking the deck for failure and increased privatization. She argues that “two-tier medicine is a virtual certainty if the Conservatives are re-elected.”

Journalist Susan Delancourt recently argued that health care is a “sleeper issue,” just waiting to wake up and grab the attention of voters — and politicians.

Government critics believe that medicare as Canadians know it will face serious hurdles in the years ahead — the direct result of a combination of government policy and funding cuts.

For a quick refresher, we’ve outlined five major ways the Harper goverment has eroded medicare:

1. No new Health Accord 

The government simply allowed its 10-year accord with the provinces and territories to expire in 2014 — not even bothering with the pretense of negotiations.

That lack of federal leadership has has left the provinces to forge their own path. The 2004 accord saw the feds commit $41 billion over a decade, in return for provincial pledges to commit to certain priorities, such as primary care and reducing wait times.

2. No national pharmaceutical strategy

The government backed away from developing and implementing the national pharmaceutical strategy outlined in the 2004 Health Accord — even though our aging population could certainly use the medical and financial break.

Ten days before Christmas, Ontario’s health minister wrote an op-ed calling for national pharmacare.

2014 study commissioned by the Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions, posits that a national pharmacare plan would reduce drug costs and administration fees. 

Data compiled by CFNU shows Canada had the highest per capita growth in prescription drug expenditures between 2000-2010, and Canadians had the second highest per capita prescription drug expenditures among OECD countries in 2011:

pharma-expenditures.png

3. Defunding the Health Council of Canada 

The government stopped funding the Health Council of Canada, a major blow to national health care strategy and standards — and all to save $6 million.

Michael McBane, national coordinator of the Canadian Health Coalition, argued that, with the move, the government essentially said “it is time to wind down national medicare.” Formed in 2003 to provide coordination and accountability on national health care, the council’s elimination “put an end to pan-Canadian health outcomes” and “common standards across the country,” McBane wrote in the Star. 

It’s little wonder the Tories aren’t fans of the council when their reports said things like this:

“We cannot continue our disparate, tentative approaches to health care reform across the country.”

4. Painful new federal health transfer formula

In 2011, the government unilaterally announced that, starting in 2016-2017, the annual growth rate in federal health transfers will decrease from the fixed number of 6%, and instead be tied to nominal GDP growth (with a minimum of 3%).

The CHC estimates this could cut transfers to provinces and territories by $36 billion over 10 years (2017-2027). Cash-starved provincial governments would be hard-pressed to fill that void, with private health care advocates eagerly waiting to lend a “helping hand.”

Doubling down on unilateral changes, the 2014 federal budget made the equalization portion of the Health Care Transfer contingent on a per capita formula — as opposed to needs-based. This move is expected to reduce transfers to have-not provinces by $16.5 billion over five years.

5. Offloading cost  

The federal share of health care spending is projected to nosedive from its current level of 20% to below 12% in the next few decades. The below chart, based on numbers from the Parliamentary Budget Officer, comes courtesy of the Canadian Health Coalition:

 health-care-graph_0.jpg

Help us protect Canadians by holding the powerful accountable.

Journalism is an important public service. That’s why PressProgress is prioritizing stories aimed at keeping Canadians safe and holding the powerful accountable during the coronavirus pandemic.

Please consider supporting our award-winning non-profit news organization so we can keep making a positive impact for Canadians.

 

Support Our Journalism
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2021-05-06 News

Police Departments Across Ontario Are Issuing Statements Rejecting Use of Doug Ford’s Controversial New Police Powers

Related Stories

News

Disability Groups Say Ontario Government Did Not Consult Them on Life and Death COVID-19 ‘Triage’ Decisions

View the post
Explainer

How Federal Leadership Can Help Establish Important Social Programs and Health Reforms

View the post
News

Doug Ford’s Campaign Lawyer is Representing a Mysterious Anti-Teacher Group That is Under RCMP Investigation

View the post

Explainers

Politics & strategy

Tom Parkin

How Federal Leadership Can Help Establish Important Social Programs and Health Reforms

View the post
Power and democracy

Andrea Reimer

Why Powerful People Do Stupid Things

View the post
Work & rights

Liz Walker and Shanice Regis-Wilkins

What Anti-Worker Businesses Don’t Want You To Know About the Value of Unions

View the post