thumb_mad-men_1-1.jpg
thumb_mad-men_1-1.jpg This article is more than 6 years old

Even right-wingers aren’t thrilled with Stephen Harper’s income splitting plan

Stephen Harper’s proposed family income splitting plan isn’t even popular with right-wingers, according to a new survey of 5,000 supporters of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. The right-wing organization surveyed supporters in the lead-up to the Parliamentary session that kicked this week, and found the majority said paying down debt should be the top priority (52%) […]

Stephen Harper’s proposed family income splitting plan isn’t even popular with right-wingers, according to a new survey of 5,000 supporters of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.

The right-wing organization surveyed supporters in the lead-up to the Parliamentary session that kicked this week, and found the majority said paying down debt should be the top priority (52%) compared to reducing taxes (44%).

And when it comes to what kind of tax cuts they want, income splitting is decidedly not a favoured option.

During the 2011 election campaign, Harper promised that once the federal budget was balanced, the Conservatives would bring in income splitting for families with children under 18 (up to $50,000). Harper restated his commitment to reduce taxes during his speech on Monday to mark the beginning of the Parliamentary session.

Think tanks across the ideological spectrum have come out against the income splitting proposal, with research showing 9 out of 10 Canadians would receive no benefit from the $3 billion Mad Men Giveaway.

Meanwhile, the majority of families (54.1%) that are the express target of the Conservative proposal — couples with children under 18 — would see no benefit whatsoever. Under the proposal, dubbed by one group as “inequality by design,” the benefits would go disproportionately to Canada’s wealthiest families with a top income-earner and a stay-at-home spouse.

This reality seems to have sunk in among CTF supporters.

When asked if they prefer across the board tax cuts or income splitting, they overwhelmingly sided with tax cuts (72.4%) compared to income splitting (21.5%). Meanwhile, just 14.3% said income splitting would be a “meaningful” tax cut to them personally. Only 9% picked the government’s income splitting proposal as their top choice for a tax cut.

This is what that looks like:

Which approach do you prefer: across-the-board tax cuts or income splitting?

screen_shot_2014-09-16_at_9.56.02_am.png

If the Conservatives go ahead with family income splitting, will it be meaningful to you personally?

2screen_shot_2014-09-16_at_9.55.33_am.png

If the federal government opts to cut personal income taxes, what is your preferred option?

3screen_shot_2014-09-16_at_10.52.00_am.png

In other words, you know a tax cut is in trouble when…

Photo: Broadbent Institute.

Help us protect Canadians by holding the powerful accountable.

Journalism is an important public service. That’s why PressProgress is prioritizing stories aimed at keeping Canadians safe and holding the powerful accountable during the coronavirus pandemic.

Please consider supporting our award-winning non-profit news organization so we can keep making a positive impact for Canadians.

 

Support Our Journalism
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2021-02-021 News

Doug Ford, In the Middle of a Deadly Pandemic, Calls Paid Sick Days a ‘Waste of Taxpayers Money’

Related Stories

News

Jason Kenney Quietly Cut His Energy War Room’s Funding By Two-Thirds Using a Sneaky Accounting Trick

View the post
News Brief

Authorities Dropped Criminal Probe Into Canada’s Biggest Newspapers Despite Evidence They Plotted to Shut Down Local Newspapers

View the post
News

Oil Executives Pressured Regina, Saskatchewan to Withdraw Motion Banning Public Buildings From Being Named After Oil Companies

View the post

Explainers

Politics & strategy

Tom Parkin

Why Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh Are Taking Very Different Positions on Private, For-Profit Long-Term Care

View the post
Human rights & inclusion

Amira Elghawaby

Why The Full Impact of Hate Groups on Targeted Communities Is Not Captured By Hate Crime Statistics

View the post
Power and democracy

Andrea Reimer

How The COVID-19 Pandemic Revealed Canada’s Most Powerful People Have Less Power Than They Think

View the post