fraserinstitute-rightwing_thumb-1.png
fraserinstitute-rightwing_thumb-1.png This article is more than 5 years old

America taking notice of Fraser Institute’s “misleading” research

Fraser Institute gets called out by experts. Again.

The Fraser Institute has made another international headline for all the wrong reasons.

One of America’s top news sites has called out the right-wing think tank for “misleading” research based on a “fallacy.”

A new CNBC story slams the methodology used in the Fraser Institute’s recent report on Canadian household debt.

Statistics Canada shows the country’s average household debt has grown considerably in recent years. But the Fraser Institute described it as “not excessive” and called concern over the issue “overblown.”

While the Institute said there’s little evidence to show Canadians are borrowing beyond their means, CNBC quotes two economists who seriously disagree.

Why?

 1. The Fraser Institute report is “misleading”…

… because it ignores principal repayments on original loans – and only shows the payments on debt interest, according to David Madani, an economist with Capital Economics.

He also published a critique of the think tank’s report on Monday:

 “The all-clear siren sounded by the Fraser Institute last week on household debt is misleading. The debt service metric they use only captures the interest cost portion of debt, which completely misses the point in a high debt, low interest rate environment.”

Madani said an expected rise in market interest rates in the coming years will make Canadian household debt burdens even “more onerous.”

2. The Fraser Institute report is based on a “fallacy”… 

… because it argues that rising Canadian private debt is being offset by the fact that personal assets and net worth levels are increasing at a higher rate.

CNBC countered that “this sort of thinking has been lambasted by economists.” Then they interviewed one just to prove their point.

Steve Keen, head of the School of Economics, Politics & History at London’s Kingston University, told CNBC that relying on rising assets is a “fallacy,” noting “it’s much more sensible to compare the level of debt to the level of income.”

This isn’t the first time the Fraser Institute’s methodology has been slammed internationally. Just ask the United Nations‘ agency on international labour or Hong Kong.

Photo: barkbud. Used under a Creative Commons licence.

Help us protect Canadians by holding the powerful accountable.

Journalism is an important public service. That’s why PressProgress is prioritizing stories aimed at keeping Canadians safe and holding the powerful accountable during the coronavirus pandemic.

Please consider supporting our award-winning non-profit news organization so we can keep making a positive impact for Canadians.

 

Support Our Journalism
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2021-02-017 News

Rex Murphy: Don’t Listen to ‘Television and Radio’, They Want You to Believe That Climate Change is Real

Related Stories

News

Doug Ford’s Government Is Looking For Private ‘Corporations’ To Perform Eye Surgeries In Ontario

View the post

Possible Leadership Run By Right-Wing Social Media Personality Sounds Alarm Bells Inside BC Liberal Party

View the post
News

Teachers Must Stay On School Premises Even If No In-Person Classes Are Scheduled, Ontario School Board Says

View the post

Explainers

Human rights and inclusion

Amira Elghawaby

Why The Full Impact of Hate Groups on Targeted Communities Is Not Captured By Hate Crime Statistics

View the post
Power and democracy

Andrea Reimer

How The COVID-19 Pandemic Revealed Canada’s Most Powerful People Have Less Power Than They Think

View the post