harper-binoculars-thumb-1.png
harper-binoculars-thumb-1.png

VIDEO: Conservative MP ‘disagrees’ with Stephen Harper on C-51 oversight

A Conservative MP has broken ranks with the Prime Minister in calling for greater checks and balances in his own government’s anti-terrorism bill. Responding to a recent question about Bill C-51’s lack of oversight on community station TVCogeco, Conservative MP Michael Chong said, “I disagree with the government’s position on this. They’re of the view […]

March 23, 2015

A Conservative MP has broken ranks with the Prime Minister in calling for greater checks and balances in his own government’s anti-terrorism bill.

Responding to a recent question about Bill C-51’s lack of oversight on community station TVCogeco, Conservative MP Michael Chong said, “I disagree with the government’s position on this. They’re of the view that the current oversight [the Security Intelligence Review Committee] is sufficient.”

“I don’t think that’s sufficient quite simply because this committee’s appointed by the Prime Minister,” Chong added.

The five-member SIRC is Canada’s intelligence oversight body. Past appointees to SIRC have included former Reform Party MPs oil lobbyists, and Arthur Porter. Porter is currently awaiting extradition from Panama on fraud charges.

“I don’t think that gives it enough of an arm’s-length relationship — enough independence to properly review the activities of security and intelligence agencies and hold the government to account.”

WATCH CONSERVATIVE MP MICHAEL CHONG CRITICIZE HIS OWN GOVERNMENT’S POSITION ON C-51 OVERSIGHT:

Since the anti-terrorism bill was introduced in January, C-51’s critics have included four former prime ministersover 100 legal experts and even prominent conservative voices. Many concerns have honed in on the need for checks and balances on the bill’s new powers.

In February, Prime Minister Harper responded to that criticism:

“We already have a rigorous system of oversight on our national security and police agencies. Specifically on intelligence, we have the Security Intelligence Review Committee, which is a robust mechanism for independent, expert, third party oversight. It functions very well. We are proud of the work it is doing.”

When CTV’s Robert Fife pointed out that even SIRC chair Deborah Grey said “the spy agency isn’t telling them a lot of stuff,” Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney had this to say:

“Any additional [oversight] would be just duplication.”

And here’s what Blaney’s parliamentary secretary, Roxanne James, added to the debate:

“We are not interested in creating needless red tape.”

WATCH CONSERVATIVES EXPLAIN HOW CHECKS AND BALANCES ON NEW TERROR LAW ARE “NEEDLESS RED TAPE”:

Chong added that, while he supports the broad goals of C-51 and will vote for it, he thinks a motion could be introduced to add parliamentary oversight.

The MP said he favours a parliamentary oversight committee in which members are elected by their “peers” as opposed to being selected by the prime minister or party leaders.

Photo: PMHarper.

Most Shared

Invest in our work

We break news and shine a light on stories Canada’s major media outlets miss. But we need your help to keep making an impact.

Subscribe to our Friday Newsletter

Too busy to follow the daily news? Get the inside scoop on the entire week’s news sent to your email inbox every Friday at noon.

Invest in our work

We break news and shine a light on stories Canada’s major media outlets miss. But we need your help to keep making an impact.

harper-vivatherich-thumb_0-1.png
harper-vivatherich-thumb_0-1.png

Stephen Harper’s ex-speechwriter blasts income splitting as “socialism for the wealthy”

It seems Stephen Harper can’t even get people who used to work for him to get behind income splitting. The late Finance Minister Jim Flaherty expressed his concerns last year, saying the scheme needed a rethink because “there are some people who benefit and lots of people who don’t in that world of income splitting.” We […]

March 20, 2015

It seems Stephen Harper can’t even get people who used to work for him to get behind income splitting.

The late Finance Minister Jim Flaherty expressed his concerns last year, saying the scheme needed a rethink because “there are some people who benefit and lots of people who don’t in that world of income splitting.”

We also heard from the conservative-minded C.D. Howe Institute, who criticized income splitting for shutting out “single parents…