harper-stockoptions_thumb-1.png
harper-stockoptions_thumb-1.png This article is more than 6 years old

VIDEO: Stephen Harper screws up answer on CEO stock options tax loophole

Stephen Harper might want to ask for a mulligan.

Stephen Harper might want to ask for a mulligan.

Maybe he’d do a better job explaining why he’s resisting closing a costly tax loophole that overwhelmingly benefits Canada’s wealthiest CEOs and corporate executives?

During Thursday night’s Globe Debate on the economy, the Conservative leader claimed it is impossible “to raise hundreds of millions of dollars through closing the treatment of stock options, there is simply not that kind of money.”

Is that true?

The Department of Finance’s own numbers show the government lost $750 million in revenue due to use of the stock option loophole last year.

“Stock options have become the single largest component of compensation among CEOs and senior executives at large publicly traded companies in Canada,” University of Victoria public administration professor Lindsay Tedd explained in 2012. “The income from stock options is granted preferential tax treatment when compared to other forms of employment remuneration.”

While most people pay tax on 100% of their wages or salaries, corporate executives who pay themselves in stock options are able to avoid tax on half their income thanks to a special deduction created in 1984.

It’s estimated 90% of the benefits from stock option loophole go to Canada’s wealthiest 1% of taxpayers.

Ten of Canada’s top CEOs have nearly one and a half billion dollars in unexercised stock options alone.

In 2013, the Globe and Mail reported that a dozen Conservative and Liberal Senators held millions in stock options from their work moonlighting on corporate boards. Senators Pamela Wallin (who will soon discover if she’ll be facing criminal charges) and Irving Gerstein (currently the chief fundraiser of the Conservative Party) each held close to a million dollars each in stock options.

Even the Conservative Party’s often turned to “tax expert” Jack Mintz concedes closing the stock option loophole “is a better way to tax the rich than to just raise rates.”

Correction notice: An earlier draft of this story indicated Mintz holds stock options in connection to his work on two corporate boards. In fact, Mintz holds restricted shares, which are taxed at the full personal rate.

Our journalism is powered by readers like you.

We’re an award-winning non-profit news organization that covers topics like social and economic inequality, big business and labour, and right-wing extremism.

Help us build so we can bring to light stories that don’t get the attention they deserve from Canada’s big corporate media outlets.

 

Donate
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2020-01-06 Exclusive

Top Doug Ford Adviser Sent Premier’s Office Backchannel Message About Meeting With Russian Government

Related Stories

Exclusive

Infrastructure Bank Wants To Let Private Finance ‘Renew’ the ‘Water Sector’

View the post
News

WestJet asked non-union staff to provide scab labour in case of Calgary, Vancouver strike

View the post
News

This Right-Wing Québec Media Website Has Mysterious Ties With Alberta’s Oil Lobby

View the post

Explainers

Human rights & inclusion

Amira Elghawaby

Here’s The Problem With Hoping Corporations Will Be Socially and Environmentally Responsible On Their Own

View the post
Politics & strategy

Jeremy Appel

The battle of the PACs in Calgary’s municipal election

View the post
Politics & strategy

Jeremy Appel

27 Different Candidates are Vying to be Calgary’s Mayor. Here Are the Biggest Issues at Stake.

View the post
Why do newspapers always have a business section but not a labour section? We’ve launched a free newsletter covering labour issues in Canada.
Get All Your Canadian Labour News in One Place
Why do newspapers always have a business section but not a labour section? Good news! We’ve launched a newsletter covering labour issues in Canada.