thumb-2020-12-022
thumb-2020-12-022 This article is more than 1 year old
News

Ottawa Says Court Battle With First Nations Kids Is Really About Giving First Nations Communities a Chance to ‘Participate’

First Nations' children's advocate Cindy Blackstock says the federal government's explanation is a 'bogus excuse'

The federal government says the real reason it’s challenging a Human Rights ruling ordering Ottawa to compensate First Nations children is because First Nations communities weren’t consulted by the tribunal.

Just before the holidays, the government filed for a judicial review regarding a November 2020 ruling ordering it compensate Indigenous children harmed by discriminatory welfare services, even if they lack “Indian Act Status.”

The tribunal previously found on-reserve Indigenous health and education services funding was about 38% lower than funding for non-Indigenous services. Instead of equalizing funding and compensating those harmed, the government spent millions of dollars in a four-year battle challenging the decision.

In its application, the federal government calls the Human Rights Tribunal’s decision a “clear overreach.”

In a statement to PressProgress, a spokesperson for Indigenous Services Canada clarified the government’s rationale for appealing the ruling, suggesting that the Human Rights Tribunal’s decision was “made without broad participation of First Nations communities across Canada”:

The Government of Canada has sought judicial review of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s July and November 2020 decisions, which impose a definition of First Nations child for purposes of the administration of Jordan’s Principle. The Tribunal decisions were made without broad participation of First Nation communities across Canada and will have future implications for provision of services for First Nation communities.

The Indigenous Services Canada spokesperson further said:

The Government of Canada maintains that First Nations communities are best placed to make the decision as to who qualifies as a First Nations child. Canada continues to engage with First Nations partners on the registration provisions of the Indian Act and how they affect broader eligibility for a range of programs and services offered by the Government of Canada. This includes eligibility for those who are not eligible for registration but have a parent who is registered or eligible to be registered under the Indian Act.

The spokesperson reiterated that the government is appealing an order to compensate First Nations children for racial discrimination on the grounds that this decision should be “left to communities and communities alone to decide”:

The Government of Canada firmly maintains that the decision as to who qualifies as a First Nations child should be left to communities and communities alone to decide. Deciding who belongs to a First Nations community is complex, and Canada will support First Nations in making those decisions.

Hadley Friedland, a University of Alberta assistant law professor, said the government’s argument is a bit confusing.

“It is not clear to me, on its face, how the CHRT decision could potentially interfere with Indigenous communities’ decisions as to who qualifies as a First Nations child,” Friedland told PressProgress.

Cindy Blackstock, executive director of the First Nations Caring Society — which is named in the federal government’s application — called the government’s statement a “bogus excuse.”

“Days before Christmas, the federal government has decided to take First Nations children living off-reserve to court to overturn a legal order ensuring they can get the public services they need under Jordan’s Principle.”

Blackstock noted Jordan’s Principle, which the tribunal cited and which entitles Indigenous children to equitable funding for health and social services when needed, has been supported by legal orders.

“The government is saying it is doing this to consult with First Nations. Jordan’s Principle has been around for 15 years, is supported by First Nations and it has taken numerous legal orders to enforce,” Blackstock said.

 

Our journalism is powered by readers like you.

We’re an award-winning non-profit news organization that covers topics like social and economic inequality, big business and labour, and right-wing extremism.

Help us build so we can bring to light stories that don’t get the attention they deserve from Canada’s big corporate media outlets.

 

Donate
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2022-10-01 Video

Pierre Poilievre Claims He’s a Friend of the ‘Working Class’. He’s Spent Years Attacking Canadian Workers.

Related Stories

News

Amazon’s Use of “Massive Loophole” in Labour Law Hinders Courier Union Drive

View the post
News

Christian Nationalists Are Organizing Against LGBTQ Education Resources in Schools

View the post
News

5,000 Winnipeg City Workers Poised to Strike for the First Time in a Century

View the post

Explainers

Human rights & inclusion

Amira Elghawaby

Here’s The Problem With Hoping Corporations Will Be Socially and Environmentally Responsible On Their Own

View the post
Politics & strategy

Jeremy Appel

The battle of the PACs in Calgary’s municipal election

View the post
Politics & strategy

Jeremy Appel

27 Different Candidates are Vying to be Calgary’s Mayor. Here Are the Biggest Issues at Stake.

View the post
Newspapers always have a business section – why not a labour section? We’ve launched a free newsletter covering labour issues in Canada.
Get Canadian Labour News You Won't Find in Corporate Newspapers.
We’ve launched a free newsletter covering labour issues in Canada.
Get Canadian Labour News You Won't Find in Corporate Newspapers