The Manning Centre's "expert on terrorism" has been repeatedly criticized by real experts on terrorism.
This is the Manning Centre’s go-to “expert on terrorism”?
At this weekend’s Manning Centre Conference in Ottawa, one of the right-wing think tank’s “expert” panelists suggested a Quebec City mosque, attacked by a man who held far-right anti-immigration views last month, had links to terrorist entities – a claim that has never been alleged by police or other national security officials.
Thomas Quiggin, an obscure researcher whom the Manning Centre presented as an “expert on terrorism” despite having been widely criticized by recognized experts in the same field, delivered a speech at the 2017 Manning Conference’s panel titled “leading the response to Islamist extremism and its ideology in Canada.”
After acknowledging the attack that left six Muslim congregants dead was “a horrific thing,” Quiggin proceeded to tell the audience that he believes the mosque was likely targeted because it funneled “tens of thousands of dollars” to a “terrorist entity.”
— PressProgress (@pressprogress) February 24, 2017
What proof does the Manning Centre’s “expert on terrorism” offer to back up his claims?
According to a January blog post on Quiggin’s website, the so-called “expert” bases his entire thesis on a 1992 phone book, a website that the New York Times recently labelled an “anti-muslim” conspiracy theory blog and a methodology that at times seems loosely inspired by Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon.
If that isn’t a serious red flag, here’s what Maclean’s magazine had to say about the Manning Centre expert’s credentials this weekend:
“Thomas Quiggin, a self-styled security and terrorism expert who runs the Terrorism and Security Experts network … Quiggin’s various research conclusions and work with the obscure TSEC Network have been vehemently criticized by acknowledged security and terrorism experts.”
And calling the whole panel “bonkers,” here’s what the National Post thought about Quiggin’s Manning Conference remarks:
“Thomas Quiggin of the Terrorism and Security Experts network then rattled through a deck of slides that would have left an uninformed viewer thinking most every mosque in Canada — including the Islamic Cultural Centre in Quebec City, site of the massacre — was funnelling funds to extremist groups … He suggested intelligence officials should have known … that the mosque was supporting extremists, and that the gunman was intending to take his revenge — Quiggin suspects — for that support.”
Meanwhile, the National Council of Canadian Muslims has flagged Quiggin’s work as “shoddy research,” noting Quiggin’s “record of promoting discredited, conspiratorial ideas about Canadian Muslims and their institutions.”
Plus one national security expert at Carleton University describes Quiggin as a guy “in a basement reading Breitbart.”
The Manning Centre had come under fire before the conference for advertising its panel on “Islamist extremism” with an image of a ticking time bomb.
— Kathleen Smith (@KikkiPlanet) February 6, 2017
If the Manning Centre is interested in “leading the response” to extremism, maybe they could start leading by example?