Liberal Environment Minister Catherine McKenna’s Twitter mentions are a total disaster right now
A lot of angry tweets are being sent to @cathmckenna after the Liberal government approved the Pacific Northwest LNG project.
Not a good day to check the tweets being sent to @cathmckenna.
On Tuesday, the Liberal government approved the Pacific Northwest LNG project in British Columbia, a move that might be of some assistance to BC Premier Christy Clark as an election looms on the horizon.
The controversial project involves fracking for natural gas in northern BC and building a pipeline to an export terminal to the Pacific coast.
First Nations leaders say the government hasn’t consulted impacted communities, while environmental groups say the project will be “one of the largest carbon polluters in the country.”
Despite these criticisms, Environment Minister Catherine McKenna claimed the Liberal government’s decision to approve the LNG project was guided by “science” and the “traditional knowledge of Indigenous peoples.”
This decision was based on science, traditional knowledge of Indigenous peoples and other relevant scientific evidence. pic.twitter.com/RlAcrkyplj
— Catherine McKenna (@cathmckenna) September 28, 2016
Let’s check-in and see how people are reacting to that:
— heidi michaela (@heidigwaii_) September 28, 2016
— Steve Ward (@TrekkerSteve) September 28, 2016
— Brent Patterson (@CBrentPatterson) September 28, 2016
— Dr. Travis G Gerwing (@Dr_TGG) September 28, 2016
— Jennifer Green (@jennlikespens) September 28, 2016
— Bette Chadwick (@afrogirl7) September 28, 2016
— Lorraine Chisholm (@lchisholm) September 28, 2016
— Islaylamb (@islayscotch) September 28, 2016
— VeganDKB Ⓥ (@donkearbour) September 28, 2016
This is not sunny ways, it’s Harper ways. https://t.co/ukS3RsWCYA
— Amanda (@Anudda) September 28, 2016
Meanwhile, others noted McKenna’s invocation of the “traditional knowledge of Indigenous peoples” in an attempt to sell a fracking project.
@cathmckenna what traditional Indigenous knowledge specifically are you referring to that would condone a natural gas pipeline? Ludicrous.
— Christi Belcourt (@christibelcourt) September 28, 2016
oooh so we’re going to use “indigenous traditional knowledge” to extract gas in a $36 billion project. trudeau’s woke neoliberal canada pic.twitter.com/QiTvFi4vZ4
— Ennui GO (@funnyhandle) September 28, 2016
Seriously, you’re going to invoke traditional Indigenous knowledge? #PNWLNG
— irina cerić (@irinaceric) September 28, 2016
Hey look, a vague appeal to Indigenous “traditional knowledge” in support of colonial decision-making. https://t.co/Lct3HC6CpN
— the gwitchin kris (@GwitchinKris) September 28, 2016
Soon traditional knowledge will be “when they want to pretend they consulted us, they’ll say they listened to ‘traditional knowledge'” https://t.co/hAfdO0ispF
— Douglas Hunter (@DWHauthor) September 28, 2016
— Barbara Low (@BarbaraXLow) September 28, 2016
Canada’s approval is rooted in colonialism, not “traditional knowledge”. FYI- Ancestral teachings on LNG pipelines are nonexistent. https://t.co/VcErbbEY3S
— Melissa Daniels (@DeneLegalEagle) September 28, 2016
And all this comes on the heels of McKenna confirming her Liberal government would be sticking to Stephen Harper’s targets for reducing carbon emissions.
— Amanda Mitchell (@iheartcities) September 28, 2016
— Torrance Coste (@TorranceCoste) September 28, 2016
No better than the HarperCons we tossed… Enjoy the next 3 years…. pic.twitter.com/bEGIXXdv1J
— David (@davidfprocter) September 28, 2016
— Erin Flanagan (@e_flanagan) September 28, 2016
— Benjamin Woo (@geek_worlds) September 28, 2016
— StumpyJoChilds (@StumpyJoChilds) September 28, 2016
— Andrew Rose (@andrewjrose) September 28, 2016
— David Paterson (@DavidPatersonca) September 28, 2016
— greg blanchette (@greg_blee) September 28, 2016
— Jess Chant (@chantface) September 28, 2016
— Graeme Reed (@graereed8) September 28, 2016
— Bob Heaslip (@BobHeaslip) September 28, 2016
That didn’t go well at all.
Photo: Environmentcan. Used under Creative Commons license.
Our journalism is powered by readers like you.
We’re an award-winning non-profit news organization that covers topics like social and economic inequality, big business and labour, and right-wing extremism.
Help us build so we can bring to light stories that don’t get the attention they deserve from Canada’s big corporate media outlets.