lana-unhcr-refugees2_thumb-1.png
lana-unhcr-refugees2_thumb-1.png
Analysis

Ford’s ‘catastrophic’ legal aid cuts target refugees and immigrants

And may violate human rights norms

April 16, 2019

Advocates and experts say changes to Legal Aid support for immigration and refugee claimants puts more vulnerable people at risk and could violate human rights law.

Canadian Press reported Legal Aid Ontario’s CEO said, in the memo issued Monday: “The province has told the agency it can only use federal funding to cover new immigration and refugee services this year.”

Erin Simpson, chair the Advocacy Committee with the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers, described the cuts as “catastrophic,” and the resulting service reductions as a human rights violation.

Speaking with Press Progress, Simpson said it means counsel will not be provided “in preparation for hearings or of evidence and the services that used to go along with it.”

It’s a human rights violation because people’s fundamental human rights are at stake — access to counsel and access to justice

Likewiase, Neethan Shan, executive director of the Urban Alliance on Race Relations told PressProgress “Equitable access to Justice is the only way to ensure there is fairness and accoutability in our justice system and therefore cutting legal aid support to the racialized communities is a violation of the right to be treated equally by law. ”

Osgoode Hall law professor Sean Rehaag explains further:

This means that non-citizens who cannot afford lawyers will need to represent themselves – at their refugee hearings, in refugee appeals and judicial reviews, in immigration detention proceedings, in humanitarian and compassionate applications for permanent residence, and the like

Simpson noted, some, meanwhile, have already questioned the cuts’ legal viability.

Rehaag told PressProgress “we know that outcomes in refugee determinations hinge partly on access to counsel, the direct result of the LAO cuts is that some people who meet the refugee definition are likely not to be recognized as such.”

In that case? Rehaag noted “they will be at risk of being deported to face persecution, torture or even death.”

That, Rehaag said, would “leave Canada in contravention of international law.”

Additionally, Rehaag noted, for The Conversation: 

refugee determinations involve high stakes and important rights. If not properly recognized, refugee claimants may be deported to face persecution, torture or even death. Because of these stakes, claimants are constitutionally entitled to a refugee determination process that complies with the principles of fundamental justice.

Invest in our work

We break news and shine a light on stories Canada’s major media outlets miss. But we need your help to keep making an impact.

Subscribe to our Friday Newsletter

Too busy to follow the daily news? Get the inside scoop on the entire week’s news sent to your email inbox every Friday at noon.

Invest in our work

We break news and shine a light on stories Canada’s major media outlets miss. But we need your help to keep making an impact.

kenney-labour_thumb
kenney-labour_thumb
Analysis

Five More Troubling UCP Candidates You Need To Meet

Alberta's United Conservative Party is remarkable in many ways

April 15, 2019

Jason Kenney’s United Conservative Party is remarkable, in many ways, among them is the sheer number of bigots, bozos and sketchy characters swirling around it.

On April 4, PressProgress issued a round-up of 30 candidates for Alberta’s United Conservative Party found to seemingly-hold bigoted and hateful views.

Since then, the list has only grown.

Here’s an update:

Travis Toews — UCP Candidate for Grand Prairie-Wapiti

[caption id=”attachment_25214″…