calculator-jakeandlindsay-by2.0-1.jpg
calculator-jakeandlindsay-by2.0-1.jpg This article is more than 8 years old

Family income splitting just the beginning of Tory tax troubles

The family split inside the Conservative Party over family income splitting is pure gold for political junkies. First, the Finance Minister publicly trash talks the key election promise of the Prime Minister, now that the implementation date is fast approaching. Senior ministers respond by doubling down on the plan to allow families with children under 18 […]

The family split inside the Conservative Party over family income splitting is pure gold for political junkies.

First, the Finance Minister publicly trash talks the key election promise of the Prime Minister, now that the implementation date is fast approaching.

Senior ministers respond by doubling down on the plan to allow families with children under 18 to split their household income, up to $50,000.

Then the Prime Minister’s Office chimes in, whispering in reporters’ ears that this was all part of the plan: Harper was having doubts about the $3 billion Mad Men giveaway, so he sent Flaherty out to throw cold water on the idea.

But let’s get back to the policy and Flaherty’s central criticism of it. “I’m not sure that overall it benefits our society,” Flaherty explained.

Flaherty is right: an analysis of the proposal shows the Conservative plan is skewed heavily in favour of wealthy two-parent families, with the vast majority of families (86%) receiving no benefit at all.

Too bad so many of the federal tax breaks are skewed toward wealthier Canadians, exacerbating income inequality.

Don’t take our word for it. Peter Devries, a former director of fiscal policy at the Department of Finance, lays it out in the Globe and Mail.

“Mr. Flaherty’s main argument against income splitting — that the benefits are not broadly shared — applies to many of the 160 targeted tax breaks that Conservatives have proudly introduced since 2006,” Mr. Devries pointed out.

Here’s a sampling:

Child Fitness Tax Credit (CFTC)

The tax credit, introduced in 2007, was designed to promote physical activity among kids, but research shows that the $100 million annual expenditure (in foregone federal tax revenues) doesn’t reach families in the different income groups equitably. 

Amin Mawan, a professor of taxation at the Schulich School of Business at York University, studied the program and summed it up in an article titled, The fitness tax credit is a subsidy for the rich.

“Our analysis of federal tax-return data showed that those in higher income groups benefit more from the CFTC. Households earning over $200,000 claimed, on average, more than $250 in additional eligible physical activity expenses than households earning less than $40,000.”

 

Education tax credits

The federal government dolls out about $1.6 billion in tax credits each year to help students pay for college and university, and  it “turns out the rich kids are getting the lion’s share” of the federal and provincial education tax credits. That’s the take away from a recent report from the C.D. Howe Institute.

Key findings include:

  • 10 per cent of people using education tax credits have an income above $80,000, but they receive 42 per cent of the total credits;
  • and about half have incomes below $30,000, but they only get 7 per cent of the total credits.

 

Pension income splitting

Pension income splitting was implemented in 2007, and is estimated to cost $1.7 billion by 2015. A study released last month by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives found that seven out of the 10 senior families get no benefit at all from the initiative. Meanwhile, the richest 10% of senior families receive more than the bottom 70% combined.

Here’s a snapshot of what this looks like, courtesy of the CCPA:

Pension Income Splitting-CCPA

 Photo: jackandlinday. Used under a Creative Commons BY 2.0 licence.

Our journalism is powered by readers like you.

We’re an award-winning non-profit news organization that covers topics like social and economic inequality, big business and labour, and right-wing extremism.

Help us build so we can bring to light stories that don’t get the attention they deserve from Canada’s big corporate media outlets.

 

Donate
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

Amazon DSP News

Pierre Poilievre Claims He’s a Friend of the ‘Working Class’. He’s Spent Years Attacking Canadian Workers.

Related Stories

News

Amazon’s Use of “Massive Loophole” in Labour Law Hinders Courier Union Drive

View the post
News

Christian Nationalists Are Organizing Against LGBTQ Education Resources in Schools

View the post
News

5,000 Winnipeg City Workers Poised to Strike for the First Time in a Century

View the post

Explainers

Human rights & inclusion

Amira Elghawaby

Here’s The Problem With Hoping Corporations Will Be Socially and Environmentally Responsible On Their Own

View the post
Politics & strategy

Jeremy Appel

The battle of the PACs in Calgary’s municipal election

View the post
Politics & strategy

Jeremy Appel

27 Different Candidates are Vying to be Calgary’s Mayor. Here Are the Biggest Issues at Stake.

View the post
Newspapers always have a business section – why not a labour section? We’ve launched a free newsletter covering labour issues in Canada.
Get Canadian Labour News You Won't Find in Corporate Newspapers.
We’ve launched a free newsletter covering labour issues in Canada.
Get Canadian Labour News You Won't Find in Corporate Newspapers