ford-gerrymandre_thumb
ford-gerrymandre_thumb
News

Doug Ford Passes ‘Vindictive’ Gerrymandering Law Aimed at Rigging Toronto’s 2018 Municipal Election

Even Doug Ford’s closest allies say the Premier of Ontario is redrawing boundaries to settle old scores with his political rivals

August 15, 2018

Doug Ford’s Ontario PC government has passed a controversial law to radically redraw Toronto’s political boundaries only two months before the City’s upcoming municipal elections in October.

After refusing to hold public consultations and shutting down legislative debate, Ford’s PCs used their majority to ram through Bill 5 – the Orwellian-named “Better Local Government Act.”

City leaders have questioned Ford’s motives ramming through radical structural changes two months before an election when he never even hinted about them on the campaign trail during Ontario’s provincial election this spring.

They’re already vowing to challenge Ford’s anti-democratic power play in court.

Opposition NDP leader Andrea Horwath says it’s clearly an “election-rigging bill” and accuses Ford of already being “drunk on power”:

“It’s about an insecure and vindictive premier looking to settle scores and control local democracy.”

Ford claims the move, which will cut the size of Toronto City Council in half, is merely a cost-saving measure, (even the Fraser Institute does not buy that story), but what it actually does is shift political power away from Toronto’s urban majority to lower-density suburban wards controlled by Ford’s right-wing allies.

Ford has stated he wants to reduce the number of wards in Toronto from 47 to 25 and align ward boundaries with federal ridings, even though federal ridings are at least two or three times larger than typical wards in Toronto and other Ontario municipalities.

Yet the approach Ford is moving forward with was actually considered during the Toronto Ward Boundary Review public consultation process in 2014. It was  ultimately rejected because it failed to meet basic criteria ensuring the new boundaries provide “balanced” and “effective representation”:

“This option would not achieve voter parity, an essential component of effective representation, nor would it address the ward population size discrepancies that Toronto now faces.”

Prior to the boundary review, the City of Toronto had not reviewed the size of ward boundaries since Toronto amalgamated in the year 2000.

Thanks to a population explosion concentrated in Toronto’s urban core over the last decade and a half, the City had become “concerned” unbalanced ward sizes were eroding “the value of a residents’ vote”:

“Some City Council wards had grown 30 per cent to 45 per cent above the average ward population.  The City was concerned that the value of a resident’s vote may not be equal across all wards if this trend continued.”

As maps published by Urban Toronto illustrate, some downtown Toronto wards contained up to 30,000 more voters than some suburban wards, distorting the balance of power in favour of the suburbs.

The boundary review aimed to balance out the difference, but Ford’s change would only make the problem worse – as many as one-third of Ford’s new suburban wards contain smaller than average populations, while Toronto’s urban wards could be significantly larger than average.

Illustraton: PressProgress, Source: Urban Toronto, Sean Marshall

Professor Roger Keil, former director of York University’s City Institute, bluntly describes Ford’s move as a transparent attempt to rig the municipal election:

“The media keeps calling this a reform. That’s a mistake … This is gerrymandering: changing political boundaries in order to favour the party in power. It is a very blatant attempt to change the rules of the game so the opposition can’t win.”

This view is even shared by one of Ford’s most “loyal” allies.

During a press conference at Queen’s Park last month, Toronto Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti bragged that gerrymandering Toronto’s ward system would punish Ford’s political rivals.

“There is going to be less left-leaning politicians in the City of Toronto,” the right-wing suburban councillor told reporters.

“That means it’s a great thing.”

 

Invest in our work

We break news and shine a light on stories Canada’s major media outlets miss. But we need your help to keep making an impact.

Subscribe to our Friday Newsletter

Too busy to follow the daily news? Get the inside scoop on the entire week’s news sent to your email inbox every Friday at noon.

Invest in our work

We break news and shine a light on stories Canada’s major media outlets miss. But we need your help to keep making an impact.

fraser-necessitiesoflife_thumb
fraser-necessitiesoflife_thumb
Fact-Check

Don’t Listen to the Fraser Institute. Canadians Are Not Paying More In Taxes Than ‘The Necessities of Life’

The Fraser Institute released another misleading report using fuzzy math to make dubious claims about taxes

August 14, 2018

The right-wing Fraser Institute has released yet another report falsely claiming the “average Canadian family” spends more on taxes than the necessities of life.

Even though their reports have been repeatedly debunked year after year after year, tabloids like the Toronto Sun uncritically reported on the Fraser Institute’s latest findings, despite the right-wing think tank’s reputation for fuzzy math.