The politics of muzzling government scientists
The politics of muzzling government scientists This article is more than 7 years old

The politics of muzzling government scientists

It isn’t easy being a scientist for the federal government these days. That’s the clear message from new research released by the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC). The union commissioned Environics Canada to “gauge the scale and impact of ‘muzzling’ and political interference among federal scientists.” Over 15,000 were invited to […]

It isn’t easy being a scientist for the federal government these days. That’s the clear message from new research released by the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC).

The union commissioned Environics Canada to “gauge the scale and impact of ‘muzzling’ and political interference among federal scientists.” Over 15,000 were invited to participate in the survey, and about 4,000 took up the offer. The results, released Monday, are startling.

Hundreds of respondents confirmed they’d been asked to “exclude or alter technical information in government documents for non-scientific reasons.” Thousands said they’d “been prevented from responding to the media or the public.”

If you’re Philip Cross, a fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, it’s “perfectly reasonable for management to exercise its right to control what is communicated to the media.”

“This is not blocking scientists from doing their work, it’s management exercising its right to control what is communicated to the media.” Besides, “most of what the federal government scientists do is monitoring and collecting data, which is then analyzed and debated by the larger academic community…. The government has every right to remind the scientists who monitor this data not to speculate about how the data might be interpreted by more-qualified experts,” Cross wrote Tuesday in an op-ed piece in the National Post.  

Is this all that’s going on inside the federal government? Check out these numbers from the PIPSC survey:

24% say they’ve been directly asked to exclude or alter information for non-scientific reasons.

48% say they’re aware of cases where their department or agency has “suppressed or declined to release information,” leading to “incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading impressions.”
 

50% say they are aware of “cases where the health and safety of Canadians” or environmental sustainability has been compromised because of political interference in their scientific work.

86% say they don’t feel they could share their work with the public without fear of censure or retaliation from their department.
 

90% say they don’t feel like they can speak freely to the media about the scientific work they do.

Photo: jennfarr. Used under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 2.0 licence.

Help us protect Canadians by holding the powerful accountable.

Journalism is an important public service. That’s why PressProgress is prioritizing stories aimed at keeping Canadians safe and holding the powerful accountable during the coronavirus pandemic.

Please consider supporting our award-winning non-profit news organization so we can keep making a positive impact for Canadians.

 

Support Our Journalism
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2021-02-024 Analysis

Doug Ford, In the Middle of a Deadly Pandemic, Calls Paid Sick Days a ‘Waste of Taxpayers Money’

Related Stories

Analysis

Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister’s ‘Mystery Bills’ Are a ‘Dangerous’ Violation of Democratic Standards, Experts Say

View the post
Fact-Check

Canada Proud is Spreading Misleading Propaganda Claiming COVID-19 Vaccines Will Be Distributed According to ‘Skin Colour’

View the post
News

Jason Kenney Quietly Cut His Energy War Room’s Funding By Two-Thirds Using a Sneaky Accounting Trick

View the post

Explainers

Politics & strategy

Tom Parkin

Why Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh Are Taking Very Different Positions on Private, For-Profit Long-Term Care

View the post
Human rights & inclusion

Amira Elghawaby

Why The Full Impact of Hate Groups on Targeted Communities Is Not Captured By Hate Crime Statistics

View the post
Power and democracy

Andrea Reimer

How The COVID-19 Pandemic Revealed Canada’s Most Powerful People Have Less Power Than They Think

View the post