Tar sands bumpf at convention
Tar sands bumpf at convention This article is more than 7 years old

Tar sands bumpf at convention

Photo: @Josh_Wingrove These buttons are making the rounds at the Conservative Party convention. A more apt slogan is, “I love GHG emissions.” Here’s what we know about Canada’s tar sands.  The goal of the Conservative government is to triple tar sands production by 2035, even as Canada keeps missing its greenhouse gas reductions targets.  After walking […]

These buttons are making the rounds at the Conservative Party convention. A more apt slogan is, “I love GHG emissions.”

Here’s what we know about Canada’s tar sands. 

The goal of the Conservative government is to triple tar sands production by 2035, even as Canada keeps missing its greenhouse gas reductions targets

After walking away from the Kyoto Protocol, Canada signed on to a more modest target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 17 per cent of 2005 levels by 2020. But we’re still waiting for the government’s twice promised emissions regulations for the oil and gas sector. 

But even with these regulations, we know Canada will miss these modest targets.

And that’s the rub here: as the late Peter Lougheed noted, the lack of a plan for any orderly development is the problem. The tar sands must be contextualised in a broader national pollution reduction framework, and their development can’t just proceed in a gold-rush style that exports Canadian jobs. 

But Canada lacks this framework, so we’re seeing development without a meaningful plan.

“They’ve increased significantly and are projected to continue to do so,” University of Alberta professor Andrew Leach points out.

Calgary Herald columnist Don Baird characterizes this trend line as “Alberta’s pathetic record on cutting greenhouse gas emissions,” saying it’s “moved into a critical red zone.”

A new study by researchers at UC Irvine and the University of Michigan paints a picture of what this looks like in areas downwind of “Canada’s main fossil fuel hub in Alberta”: higher incidence of blood cancers among men in the area.

With all this talk of the tar sands and greenhouse gas emissions, here’s another question: how many millions of dollars did the oil industry spend on rebranding the tar sands, so “oil sands” ended up on buttons at the Conservative Party convention?

Help us protect Canadians by holding the powerful accountable.

Journalism is an important public service. That’s why PressProgress is prioritizing stories aimed at keeping Canadians safe and holding the powerful accountable during the coronavirus pandemic.

Please consider supporting our award-winning non-profit news organization so we can keep making a positive impact for Canadians.

 

Support Our Journalism
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2021-04-08 New

Jason Kenney’s Energy War Room Launches Campaign to Stop Netflix Children’s Cartoon About ‘Bigfoot’

Related Stories

New

Telus’ Call Centre for Booking Vaccine Appointments in British Columbia is ‘Disorganized’ and ‘Chaotic’, Former Workers Say

View the post
News

Saskatchewan Quietly Cut Funding For Provincial Office in Charge of Climate Change Policy

View the post
Video

Doug Ford: People Who Think Essential Workers Need Paid Sick Days are ‘Totally Irresponsible’

View the post

Explainers

Human rights & inclusion

Amira Elghawaby

Canada is Bringing in New Legislation to Stop the Spread of Online Hate. Here’s How It Can Work.

View the post
Politics & strategy

Tom Parkin

Why is Erin O’Toole Pitching Conservatism to Working Class Voters?

View the post
Power and democracy

Andrea Reimer

Here’s How Canadians Can Keep Big Money Out of Politics

View the post