Say it ain’t so! Four ridiculously partisan government ads we probably won’t see again
No more Pierre Poilievre vanity videos? Say it ain’t so. The Liberal government has just unveiled new rules it says are designed to limit use of public funds for partisan purposes in government advertising. Under the new rules all government communications and advertising will have to conform to four criteria for non-partisanship: They must be […]
No more Pierre Poilievre vanity videos? Say it ain’t so.
The Liberal government has just unveiled new rules it says are designed to limit use of public funds for partisan purposes in government advertising.
Under the new rules all government communications and advertising will have to conform to four criteria for non-partisanship:
- They must be factual and explanatory;
- They must be free from political parties’ slogans, identifiers, or affiliation;
- The primary colour used in the ads cannot be the primary colours used by the governing party — so no red for Liberals, blue for Conservatives, or orange for the New Democrats;
- Advertising is devoid of any name, voice or image of federal politicians.
Now, of course, the proof will be in the pudding.
Just hours after announcing the policy, the government found itself defending Justin Trudeau’s appearance in a federal campaign designed to promote Canadian tourism – something that seems at odds with the spirit of the new policy.
And during the election campaign, the Liberals promised to appoint an advertising commissioner housed in the Office of the Auditor General to vet government ads for partisanship. Bringing in the AG sounded like a great idea – given the work of the Auditor General of Ontario in trying to clean up partisan ads in that province.
Since the election, the Trudeau government has had second thoughts, and the Advertising Standards Canada will now take on that role instead.
Nevertheless, the new rules could well spell the end of the kind of partisan advertising that became normal under the Conservatives.
So, let’s revisit a few of the classics one last time.
1. Skippy’s vanity videos
Who could forget?
In May 2015 Canada’s Employment Minister at the time, Pierre Poilievre, appeared in a series of cheesy, partisan videos to promote his pet projects.
Filmed with the assistance of public servants being paid overtime by taxpayers, the ads represented a clear blurring of the lines separating partisan politics and non-partisan public service.
In other words, if Skippy ever finds himself back in government, he may have to pursue his acting career on his own time.
2. Economic Action Plan billboards
These things sprung up like dandelions during the Conservative Party’s final years in office, as it spent an eye-popping $100 million on vague ads many Canadians didn’t even notice.
Prominently featuring the colour blue, it’s unlikely the CPC’s favourite adverts would have passed the smell test under the new rules.
Remember Stephen Harper’s easily parodied “24/7” promo videos?
Opening with a sweeping musical score and showing Harper going about his prime ministerial duties, the taxpayer-funded videos were swiftly removed from the Conservative Party’s website after PressProgress called them out.
4. The invisible government program
Think of what you could do with $2.5 million…
That was the amount the Conservative government spent to advertise the Canada Jobs Grant, blanketing the airwaves during playoff hockey to promote the federal skills training program.
Only problem? The program didn’t actually exist.
If all government advertising must be now “factual,” fictional or aspirational programs won’t count. Including a line about being “subject to Parliamentary approval” wont cut it.
Our journalism is powered by readers like you.
We’re an award-winning non-profit news organization that covers topics like social and economic inequality, big business and labour, and right-wing extremism.
Help us build so we can bring to light stories that don’t get the attention they deserve from Canada’s big corporate media outlets.