thumb_mackay-secdef-by2.0-web_2-1.jpg
thumb_mackay-secdef-by2.0-web_2-1.jpg This article is more than 7 years old

Peter MacKay slapped down (again) by judge over victim surcharge

Not long ago, Justice Minister Peter MacKay actually said homeless people should sell off “a bit of property” to come up with the cash to pay the mandatory victim surcharge if they’re convicted of an offence. An Ontario judge has just replied with a forceful response: the mandatory surcharge is unconstitutional. Here’s how we got here: […]

Not long ago, Justice Minister Peter MacKay actually said homeless people should sell off “a bit of property” to come up with the cash to pay the mandatory victim surcharge if they’re convicted of an offence.

An Ontario judge has just replied with a forceful response: the mandatory surcharge is unconstitutional.

Here’s how we got here:

  • As part of its dubious “tough on crime” agenda, the Conservative government brought in the surcharge last October, removing a judge’s discretion to waive fees if an offender was so poor that he could not pay the penalty. The new rules doubled the fine for a summary offence to $100 and $200 for an indictable offence. The money is earmarked for victims’ services.
  • Since then, judges across the country have been finding creative ways around the rules when faced with homeless people who live in shelters. Strategies have included giving people 50 years to pay off the fine.
  • In response, MacKay lashed out at judges in December, saying people should just sell some of their belongings to cover the cost.
  • In his decision released Thursday striking down the mandatory surcharge, Ontario Court Justice David Paciocco ruled that a reasonable person would find $900 in mandatory victim surcharges (for nine separate “nuisance” crimes committed by Shaun Michael while he was extremely intoxicated) as cruel and unusual punishment.

Michael, 26, is described in the Ottawa Citizen as an “addicted, impoverished and troubled” young Inuit man who survives on a street allowance of $250 a month.

Each of the $100 victim surcharges amounted to an “otherworldly” for Michael, the judge ruled.

“This is a crushing amount for him, beyond his foreseeable means. It is a sum that, in relative hardship, is many multiples of what a moneyed offender would have to pay,” Paciocco wrote. “Simply put, Mr. Michael is being treated more harshly because of his poverty than someone who is wealthy,” Justice Paciocco wrote.

Over to you, Minister MacKay. Free advice: Don’t talk about selling belongings.

Photo: secdef. Used under a Creative Commons BY-ND 2.0 licence. 

Help us protect Canadians by holding the powerful accountable.

Journalism is an important public service. That’s why PressProgress is prioritizing stories aimed at keeping Canadians safe and holding the powerful accountable during the coronavirus pandemic.

Please consider supporting our award-winning non-profit news organization so we can keep making a positive impact for Canadians.

 

Support Our Journalism
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2021-09-026 New

Erin O’Toole’s Plan to ‘Secure Pensions’ Could Allow Companies to Cut Pensions, Labour Experts Say

Related Stories

New

Conservative Candidate Penned Op/Ed Calling For Privatization of Canada’s Healthcare System

View the post
Analysis

Here’s What Canada’s 3 Major Parties’ Climate Platforms Mean for Workers

View the post
News

Confrontation Between Struggling Worker and Brampton Conservative Candidate Goes Viral on Social Media

View the post

Explainers

Human rights & inclusion

Amira Elghawaby

Why Immigrant, Newcomer and Racialized Communities Still Face Barriers to Voting in Canada

View the post
Politics & strategy

Kiavash Najafi

Why Raising Taxes on Canada’s Wealthiest Elites Is a Winning Issue This Election

View the post
Equity & Politics

Erica Ifill

Working From Home is Changing the Reality of Work. Why Aren’t Canada’s Political Leaders Talking About It?

View the post