facepalm_thumb-1.png
facepalm_thumb-1.png This article is more than 8 years old

New Fraser Institute report on taxes still as shoddy as last year’s report on taxes

The Fraser Institute's claim that Canadian families spend more on taxes than "food" or "shelter" is a staggering claim supported by many methodological problems and things that don't quite square with common sense.

Did you see the headlines?

“Taxes eat up 42% of average Canadian family’s income: Fraser Institute”

Toronto Sun

“Average Canadian family spending more on taxes than basic necessities, Fraser Institute says”

National Post 

“Canadian families spend more on taxes than food, shelter: report”

Globe and Mail

“Fraser Institute report says average Canadian families spend more on taxes than necessities”

CBC News

Staggering claims! But is any of it true? Like, even close to true?

As was pointed out last year, the right-wing Fraser Institute’s claim that Canadian families spend more on taxes than “food” and “shelter” is a staggering claim supported by many methodological problems and things that don’t quite square with common sense.

For example:

 To reach their magic number for the average Canadian family’s tax bill, the Fraser Institute takes all the tax revenues collected by all governments in Canada and divides it by the number of households. That’s it?

 The Fraser Institute’s magical number does not represent how much the average Canadian family pays in income tax each year – it also includes “indirect taxes” which, according to the Institute, includes corporate income taxes, business property taxes and natural resource levies.

Does your family pay a multinational oil company’s taxes? Here is what former editor of The Walrus John MacFarlane wrote last year about the Institute’s outlandish claim:

“Critics of the Fraser Institute report have also pointed to a bias in its definition of taxes, in terms of what it included in its calculation of the average tax bill. Are royalties on oil and gas revenues taxes? Are import duties taxes? Are taxes on goods and services, property, vehicles, fuel, alcohol, and tobacco — so-called consumption taxes — as burdensome as those applied to income? Is it reasonable to include corporate taxes in the total that Canadian families pay?”

• 2012 data from the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development pegs Canadian taxes from all conceivable sources at round 31% of GDP, which by their logic should be closer to the tax bill of the average Canadian family.

According to the same Statistics Canada data cited by the Fraser Institute, only 17.5% of the average Canadian household’s total expenses are spent on income taxes.

The Fraser Institute also claims “all types of taxes” on families are increasing “faster than the cost of basic necessities,” up by 1,866% since 1961, yet the latest OECD numbers show taxes have declined by more than 5% of GDP since 1998 and, by their own numbers, by 4.5% since 2000.  

growth-taxes-fraserinstitute.jpg

The Fraser Institute also forgets to mention that if the goal is to get us back to 1961 levels of taxation (why do they want to return to 1961? Who knows), that probably means privatizing healthcare, laying off police and fire fighters, scrapping pensions, making little freeloaders like Billy and Sally pay their own way through kindergarten, or heck, maybe even defund the CBC!

Unless, of course, that is what the Fraser Institute really wants?

Photo: A. Proimos. Used under Creative Commons search.

Our journalism is powered by readers like you.

We’re an award-winning non-profit news organization that covers topics like social and economic inequality, big business and labour, and right-wing extremism.

Help us build so we can bring to light stories that don’t get the attention they deserve from Canada’s big corporate media outlets.

 

Donate
PressProgress
PressProgress is an award-winning non-profit news organization focused on uncovering and unpacking the news through original investigative and explanatory journalism.

Most Shared

thumb-2024-07-05-danielle-smith-alberta Analysis

Take Back Alberta Leaders are Training ‘Scrutineers’ to Infiltrate Campaigns and Act as ‘Security’ on Voting Day

Related Stories

Analysis

7 Times Alberta Premier Danielle Smith Embraced Extreme, Inflammatory or Dangerous Rhetoric

View the post
New

Shopify Executive’s Right-Wing Media Website Rails Against Immigrants While Defending a Legally Designated Terrorist Group

View the post
Analysis

Sikh Groups Say Globe and Mail Reporting on 2021 Kabul Evacuation is Missing Context and Promotes Racist Tropes

View the post
Our free email newsletter delivers award-winning journalism directly to your inbox.
Get Canadian Investigative News You Won't Find in Corporate Newspapers.
Our free email newsletter delivers award-winning journalism to your inbox.
Get Canadian Investigative News You Won't Find in Corporate Newspapers.