townhall_thumb-1.png
townhall_thumb-1.png

Even Conservative MPs are admitting Canadians have an ‘appetite’ for electoral reform

Looks like Canadians are hungrier for change than Justin Trudeau thought.

October 31, 2016

pressprogress-bannerad-watchourvideo.gif

Looks like Canadians are hungrier for change than Justin Trudeau thought.

Earlier in October, Trudeau faced criticism for comments suggesting Canadians no longer had any appetite for change, leading many to conclude he was setting the stage to flip flop on his promise to bring in electoral reform.

Trudeau told a Quebec newspaper that since the Harper government was defeated, Canadians no longer have “the motivation to change the electoral system” because “they now have a government they’re more satisfied with”:

“Under Stephen Harper, there were so many people unhappy with the government and their approach that people were saying, ‘It will take electoral reform to no longer have a government we don’t like’. But under the current system, they now have a government they’re more satisfied with and the motivation to change the electoral system is less compelling.”

But it turns out only a week earlier, Trudeau submitted a report on a town hall he held in his own riding that found most of his constituents do have an appetite for change – in fact, Trudeau’s own report states “most were favourable to the idea of a proportional and mixed-proportional voting system.” 

And it looks like the people of Papineau aren’t alone: the same members’ reports filed by Conservative MPs show a considerable appetite for change in Conservative-held ridings across the country too.

According to a report submitted by one Conservative MP, there’s “certainly an appetite for change,” pretty remarkable considering the Conservatives have gone to great lengths to obstruct multi-partisan efforts at changing the status quo.

Here’s a sampling of some of what Conservative MPs said they heard:

 

Karen Vecchio:

According to a multi-partisan report on a London, Ontario town hall featuring “over 300 participants” that was submitted by Conservative MP Karen Vecchio along with three Liberal and NDP MPs, “a substantial majority of Town Hall participants had a strong desire to see electoral reform.”

Not only did they observe an “appetite for change,” they also noted a desire to “move towards a more proportional system”:

“There was certainly an appetite for change toward a more proportional system in translating votes into seats. While no clear preference was apparent, the MMP open list option received notable support across all the breakout groups.”

The report adds that constituents voiced concerns about the “inclusivity of the present system and the degree to which it reduced citizen engagement and voter interest” while they felt “proportional representation represents the Canadian value of diversity and multiculturalism” and that “PR represents the rule of the people and is more reflective of all citizen votes.”

Larry Miller:

Conservative MP Larry Miller, the so-called keeper of the conservative flame and sometimes fashion critic, consulted 5,526 households during a telephone town hall in July.

According to Miller’s report, although his constituents are “generally satisfied” with the status quo, “there are some in Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound that would like to see the electoral system reformed to better reflect the views of all voters.”

“Most notably,” Miller points out, is “support for a system of Mixed-Member Proportional representation.”

“These constituents stated that a form of Mixed-Member Proportional representation would balance regional representation with national representation.”

Bruce Stanton

Likewise, Conservative MP Bruce Stanton reports many constituents in his rural Ontario riding expressed the feeling that unless they supported the Liberals or the Conservatives, “their vote has never counted” under the current first-past-the-post system:

“In a riding like Simcoe North, which has alternated between Liberal and Conservative MPs, supporters of other parties don’t feel as though their vote has an impact or is represented. Indeed, a number of people commented that they felt like their vote had never counted.”

Stanton adds there was widespread feeling that “we should try to improve our electoral system” and noted “considerable support for different variations of Proportional Representation.”

Garnett Genuis:

Meanwhile in Alberta, Conservative MP Garnett Genuis says his constituents are evenly split between “the status quo” and “a somewhat more proportional system.”

“Roundtable participants were fairly evenly split between (mixed-member proportional) MMP advocates and advocates of the status quo,” Genuis reports:

“Those who wanted change to the status quo almost all advocated for a mixed-member proportional (MMP) system, with a threshold, and which did not give full discretion to parties to draw up their own lists.”


Marilyn Gladu:

And over in Sarnia-Lambton, Conservative MP Marilyn Gladu reports her constituents “expressed satisfaction” with the status quo, but admitted that another “frequently expressed preference was for a form of proportional voting.”

Gladu says she saw this sentiment at a town hall in Sarnia:

“Those who were not in favor of the FPTP current system seemed to favor proportional representation. There was support to vote for a local candidate instead a party ranked list, and residents were open to voting two ballots- one for a local candidate, and one for a party or Prime Minister.”

And during another town hall in Camlachie, Ontario, some constituents told Gladu that the current system is producing distorted results:

“Although they had not settled on a choice of alternative, most preferred the Mixed Member Proportional model … The reason they don’t like the First Past the Post System is that 18 times out of the last 22 elections, it has produced a majority government that got less than 39 % of the vote (which, with voter turnout could be less than a third of Canadians).”

If these official reports are anything to go by, it sounds like Canadians are hungrier for electoral reform than Trudeau thinks.

Photo: Democratic Institutions

Most Shared

Invest in our work

We break news and shine a light on stories Canada’s major media outlets miss. But we need your help to keep making an impact.

Subscribe to our Friday Newsletter

Too busy to follow the daily news? Get the inside scoop on the entire week’s news sent to your email inbox every Friday at noon.

Invest in our work

We break news and shine a light on stories Canada’s major media outlets miss. But we need your help to keep making an impact.

trudeau-morneau-precarious_thumb-1.png
trudeau-morneau-precarious_thumb-1.png

What Justin Trudeau & Bill Morneau don’t understand about the ‘reality’ of precarious work

Justin Trudeau and Bill Morneau say precarious work marked by low-wages, job insecurity and short-term contract work is "the new reality" and "we have to accept that."

October 28, 2016

PP.gif

Is this “the new reality”?

Or is it another new excuse for declining employment standards?

Last week, Finance Minister Bill Morneau made headlines after offering some tone-deaf advice to young workers struggling in today’s precarious job market dominated by low wages, job insecurity and short-term contract work – get used to the “job churn,” kids!

Commenting on people moving “job to job to job,” Morneau said “it’s going to happen. We have to accept that.”

Offered…