broken-record_thumb-1.png
broken-record_thumb-1.png

85.5% of Conservative questions on electoral reform were spent repeating the same talking point

Think Conservatives sound like a broken record on electoral reform? The numbers say you're right!

July 25, 2016

kenneywatch-banner.gif

 

Think Conservatives sound like a broken record on electoral reform?

The numbers say you’re right!

If you’ve tuned in to Question Period since the last election, federal Conservatives seem to have one response and one response only whenever anyone brings up the question of reforming Canada’s electoral system: referendum!

And if you think that’s an unproductive and obstructionist approach to multi-partisan efforts to improve Canadian democracy, you can thank Democratic Reform Minster Pierre Poilievre for that.

Poilievre was first to float the referendum talking point back in June 2015, and later proposed a law that would “ban any government from changing our voting system without holding a referendum.”

Remember: that’s the same guy who rammed through a new election law despite a widespread public outcry.

And besides, the Liberal government says they aren’t planning on holding a referendum. So case closed, right?

Flash forward to 2016 and it seems like the Conservatives position has not evolved since Poilievre first floated the “referendum” talking point last summer – making you wonder if the party has even tried to come up with any new ideas?

Consider this: there have only been 72 Question Periods since the last election.

During the last Parliamentary session, 195 of 228 questions asked by the Conservatives on electoral reform repeated Poilievre’s referendum talking point – that’s 85.5% of all questions the Conservatives asked about electoral reform:

cpc-referendums-qp.png

Put another way, each Question Period question runs 30 seconds long.

That works out to 97.5 minutes of a total 114 minutes allotted to debating electoral reform:

cpc-referendum-qp-time.png

But this summer, MPs have convened a special all-party parliamentary committee on electoral reform.

Think they’ll be trading in Poilievre’s talking points for something more constructive?

Well, during the committee’s first three meetings with witnesses, the Conservatives spent 35 of 48 questions talking about referendums:

cpc-referendum-erre.png

And if you brought a stop-watch to the committee, you’d realize two-thirds of the time Conservatives’ time questioning witnesses was related to referendums:

cpc-referendum-erre-time.png

Maybe it’s time for Conservatives to change their tune?

Photo: Shutterstock.

Invest in our work

We break news and shine a light on stories Canada’s major media outlets miss. But we need your help to keep making an impact.

Subscribe to our Friday Newsletter

Too busy to follow the daily news? Get the inside scoop on the entire week’s news sent to your email inbox every Friday at noon.

Invest in our work

We break news and shine a light on stories Canada’s major media outlets miss. But we need your help to keep making an impact.

dictators_thumb-1.png
dictators_thumb-1.png

Fraser Institute: capitalism may create less equality than tin-pot dictatorships

The Fraser Institute compares Lululemon, maker of "yoga-inspired clothing," with "authoritarian leaders and dictators."

July 21, 2016

kenneywatch-banner.gif

 

Maybe tyranny isn’t so bad after all!

In the Fraser Institute’s latest adventure into the fun and exciting world of comparing apples to oranges, the right-wing think tank discovers that some countries with dictators and/or widespread corruption have less inequality than some countries operating under laissez-faire capitalism.

So, the Fraser Institute wonders: maybe inequality isn’t such a bad thing after all?

“When deciding how much any society should worry about inequality,” says Fraser Institute executive vice-president Jason…